The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absolute Radiometric In-Flight Validation of Mid Infrared and Thermal Infrared Data From ASTER and MODIS on the Terra Spacecraft Using the Lake Tahoe, CA/NV, USA, Automated Validation Site
Abstract
In December 1999, the first Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument and an Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument were launched into polar orbit on the Terra spacecraft. Both instruments measure surface radiance, which requires that they are calibrated and validated in flight. In-flight validation is essential to independently verify that instrument calibration correctly compensates for any changes in instrument response over time. In order to meet this requirement, an automated validation site was established at Lake Tahoe on the California/Nevada border in 1999 to validate the ASTER and MODIS thermal infrared (TIR, 7-13 mum) and MODIS mid infrared (MIR, 3-5 mum) land-monitoring channels. Daytime and nighttime data were used to validate the TIR channels, and only nighttime data were used to validate the MIR channels to avoid any reflected solar contribution. Sixty-nine ASTER scenes and 155 MODIS-Terra scenes acquired between years 2000 and 2005 with near-nadir views were validated. The percent differences between the predicted and instrument at-sensor radiances for ASTER channels 10-14 were 0.165plusmn0.776, 0.103plusmn0.613, -0.305plusmn0.613, -0.252plusmn0.464, and -0.118plusmn0.489, respectively. The percent differences for MODIS-Terra channels 20, 22, 23, 29, 31, and 32 were -1.375plusmn0.973, -1.743plusmn1.027, -0.898plusmn0.970, 0.082plusmn0.631, 0.044plusmn0.541, and 0.151plusmn0.563, respectively. The results indicate that the TIR at-sensor radiances from ASTER and MODIS-Terra have met the preflight radiometric calibration accuracy specification and provide well-calibrated data sets that are suitable for measuring absolute change. The results also show that the at-sensor radiances from the MODIS-Terra MIR channels have greater bias than expected based on the preflight radiometric calibration accuracy specification
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New refinements and validation of the collection-6 MODIS land-surface temperature/emissivity product
Wan, Z. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.027 · Cited by 1,075
Validation of Collection 6 MODIS land surface temperature product using in situ measurements
Duan, S.-B., Li, Z.-L., Li, H., Göttsche, F.-M., Wu, H., Zhao, W., Leng, P., Zhang, X., & Coll, C. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.020 · Cited by 442
Cook, M., Schott, J., Mandel, J., & Raqueno, N. (2014) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs61111244 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Hook, S. J., Vaughan, R. G., Tonooka, H., & Schladow, S. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1798-1807
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169297506
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absolute Radiometric In-Flight Validation of Mid Infrared and Thermal Infrared Data From ASTER and MODIS on the Terra Spacecraft Using the Lake Tahoe, CA/NV, USA, Automated Validation Site. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2007.894564
- The paper
- Hook, S. J., Vaughan, R. G., Tonooka, H., & Schladow, S. G. (2007). Absolute Radiometric In-Flight Validation of Mid Infrared and Thermal Infrared Data From ASTER and MODIS on the Terra Spacecraft Using the Lake Tahoe, CA/NV, USA, Automated Validation Site. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2007.894564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.