The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing
Abstract
Hyperspectral unmixing is a process to identify the constituent materials and estimate the corresponding fractions from the mixture. During the last few years, nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), as a suitable candidate for the linear spectral mixture model, has been applied to unmix hyperspectral data. Unfortunately, the local minima caused by the nonconvexity of the objective function makes the solution nonunique, thus only the nonnegativity constraint is not sufficient enough to lead to a well-defined problem. Therefore, in this paper, two inherent characteristics of hyperspectral data, piecewise smoothness (both temporal and spatial) of spectral data and sparseness of abundance fraction of every material, are introduced to NMF. The adaptive potential function from discontinuity adaptive Markov random field model is used to describe the smoothness constraint while preserving discontinuities in spectral data. At the same time, two NMF algorithms, nonsmooth NMF and NMF with sparseness constraint, are used to quantify the degree of sparseness of material abundances. A gradient-based optimization algorithm is presented, and the monotonic convergence of the algorithm is proved. Three important facts are exploited in our method: First, both the spectra and abundances are nonnegative; second, the variation of the material spectra and abundance images is piecewise smooth in wavelength and spatial spaces, respectively; third, the abundance distribution of each material is almost sparse in the scene. Experiments using synthetic and real data demonstrate that the proposed algorithm provides an effective unsupervised technique for hyperspectral unmixing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Cited by 7,952
Independent Component Analysis
(2004) · Independent Component Analysis · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3717.003.0014 · Cited by 7,903
Independent Component Analysis
Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221317 · Cited by 5,007
Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data
Nascimento, J. M. P., & Dias, J. M. B. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2005.844293 · Cited by 2,669
Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints
Hoyer, P. O. (2004) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0408058 · Cited by 2,591
Keshava, N., & Mustard, J. F. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974727 · Cited by 2,549
Adaptive Blind Signal and Image Processing: Learning Algorithms and Applications
Cichocki, A., & Amari, S. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470845899 · Cited by 1,863
Heinz, D. C., & Chein-I-Chang (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.911111 · Cited by 1,847
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, S., & Qian, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-173
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2169466597
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 34.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2008.2002882
- The paper
- Jia, S., & Qian, Y. (2009). Constrained Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2008.2002882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.