The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery
Abstract
Rapid damage assessment after natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes) and violent conflicts (e.g., war-related destruction) is crucial for initiating effective emergency response actions. Remote-sensing satellites equipped with very high spatial resolution (VHR) multispectral and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging sensors can provide vital information due to their ability to map the affected areas with high geometric precision and in an uncensored manner. In this paper, we present a novel method that detects buildings destroyed in an earthquake using pre-event VHR optical and post-event detected VHR SAR imagery. The method operates at the level of individual buildings and assumes that they have a rectangular footprint and are isolated. First, the 3-D parameters of a building are estimated from the pre-event optical imagery. Second, the building information and the acquisition parameters of the VHR SAR scene are used to predict the expected signature of the building in the post-event SAR scene assuming that it is not affected by the event. Third, the similarity between the predicted image and the actual SAR image is analyzed. If the similarity is high, the building is likely to be still intact, whereas a low similarity indicates that the building is destroyed. A similarity threshold is used to classify the buildings. We demonstrate the feasibility and the effectiveness of the method for a subset of the town of Yingxiu, China, which was heavily damaged in the Sichuan earthquake of May 12, 2008. For the experiment, we use QuickBird and WorldView-1 optical imagery, and TerraSAR-X and COSMO-SkyMed SAR data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED
WELCH, B. L. (1947) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28 · Cited by 4,135
Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey
Pluim, J. P. W., Maintz, J. B. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2003.815867 · Cited by 2,890
An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment
Studholme, C., Hill, D. L. G., & Hawkes, D. J. (1999) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(98)00091-0 · Cited by 2,180
Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection
Bruzzone, L., & Prieto, D. F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.843009 · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationBazi, Y., Bruzzone, L., & Melgani, F. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.842441 · Cited by 712
Self-citationStructure detection and statistical adaptive speckle filtering in SAR images
LOPES, A., NEZRY, E., TOUZI, R., & LAUR, H. (1993) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169308953999 · Cited by 584
A detail-preserving scale-driven approach to change detection in multitemporal SAR images
Bovolo, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2005.857987 · Cited by 406
Self-citationSatellite Image Analysis for Disaster and Crisis-Management Support
Voigt, S., Kemper, T., Riedlinger, T., Kiefl, R., Scholte, K., & Mehl, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2007.895830 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Dong, L., & Shan, J. (2013) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.06.011 · Cited by 522
Liu, J., Gong, M., Qin, K., & Zhang, P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2636227 · Cited by 522
Data Fusion and Remote Sensing: An ever-growing relationship
Schmitt, M., & Zhu, X. X. (2016) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2016.2561021 · Cited by 357
Chen, H., Wu, C., Du, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2956756 · Cited by 357
Multimodal Remote Sensing Image Matching via Learning Features and Attention Mechanism
Zhang, Y., Lan, C., Zhang, H., Ma, G., & Li, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3348980 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunner, D., Lemoine, G., & Bruzzone, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2403-2420
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2135228726
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 46.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2009.2038274
- The paper
- Brunner, D., Lemoine, G., & Bruzzone, L. (2010). Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2009.2038274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.