The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity of Support Vector Machines to Random Feature Selection in Classification of Hyperspectral Data
Abstract
The accuracy of supervised land cover classifications depends on factors such as the chosen classification algorithm, adequate training data, the input data characteristics, and the selection of features. Hyperspectral imaging provides more detailed spectral and spatial information on the land cover than other remote sensing resources. Over the past ten years, traditional and formerly widely accepted statistical classification methods have been superseded by more recent machine learning algorithms, e.g., support vector machines (SVMs), or by multiple classifier systems (MCS). This can be explained by limitations of statistical approaches with regard to high-dimensional data, multimodal classes, and often limited availability of training data. In the presented study, MCSs based on SVM and random feature selection (RFS) are applied to explore the potential of a synergetic use of the two concepts. We investigated how the number of selected features and the size of the MCS influence classification accuracy using two hyperspectral data sets, from different environmental settings. In addition, experiments were conducted with a varying number of training samples. Accuracies are compared with regular SVM and random forests. Experimental results clearly demonstrate that the generation of an SVM-based classifier system with RFS significantly improves overall classification accuracy as well as producer's and user's accuracies. In addition, the ensemble strategy results in smoother, i.e., more realistic, classification maps than those from stand-alone SVM. Findings from the experiments were successfully transferred onto an additional hyperspectral data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Burges, C. J. C. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009715923555 · Cited by 16,429
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 · Cited by 10,696
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Ferrari, V. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,122
Witten, I. H. (2008) · Cited by 9,143
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
Ho, T. K. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.709601 · Cited by 6,842
Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines
Melgani, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.831865 · Cited by 4,411
Cited by
Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review
Paoletti, M. E., Haut, J. M., Plaza, J., & Plaza, A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.006 · Cited by 1,073
Deep Pyramidal Residual Networks for Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification
Paoletti, M. E., Haut, J. M., Fernandez-Beltran, R., Plaza, J., Plaza, A. J., & Pla, F. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2860125 · Cited by 531
Adam, E., Mutanga, O., Odindi, J., & Abdel-Rahman, E. M. (2014) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2014.903435 · Cited by 451
Exploring Hierarchical Convolutional Features for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Cheng, G., Li, Z., Han, J., Yao, X., & Guo, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2841823 · Cited by 308
Griffiths, P., Kuemmerle, T., Baumann, M., Radeloff, V. C., Abrudan, I. V., Lieskovsky, J., Munteanu, C., Ostapowicz, K., & Hostert, P. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Waske, B., van der Linden, S., Benediktsson, J. A., Rabe, A., & Hostert, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2880-2889
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2169500530
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 40.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of Support Vector Machines to Random Feature Selection in Classification of Hyperspectral Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2041784
- The paper
- Waske, B., van der Linden, S., Benediktsson, J. A., Rabe, A., & Hostert, P. (2010). Sensitivity of Support Vector Machines to Random Feature Selection in Classification of Hyperspectral Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2041784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.