The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-Dimensional SAR Focusing From Multipass Signals Using Compressive Sampling
Abstract
Three-dimensional synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image formation provides the scene reflectivity estimation along azimuth, range, and elevation coordinates. It is based on multipass SAR data obtained usually by nonuniformly spaced acquisition orbits. A common 3-D SAR focusing approach is Fourier-based SAR tomography, but this technique brings about image quality problems because of the low number of acquisitions and their not regular spacing. Moreover, attained resolution in elevation is limited by the overall acquisitions baseline extent. In this paper, a novel 3-D SAR data imaging based on Compressive Sampling theory is presented. It is shown that since the image to be focused has usually a sparse representation along the elevation direction (i.e., only few scatterers with different elevation are present in the same range-azimuth resolution cell), it suffices to have a small number of measurements to construct the 3-D image. Furthermore, the method allows super-resolution imaging, overcoming the limitation imposed by the overall baseline span. Tomographic imaging is performed by solving an optimization problem which enforces sparsity through ℓ1-norm minimization. Numerical results on simulated and real data validate the method and have been compared with the truncated singular value decomposition technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
An Introduction To Compressive Sampling
Candes, E. J., & Wakin, M. B. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2007.914731 · Cited by 10,017
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827596304010 · Cited by 6,845
Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling
Candès, E., & Romberg, J. (2007) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/008 · Cited by 2,075
The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n
Candes, E., & Tao, T. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000001523 · Cited by 1,747
Mark, J. W. (1975) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1975.9993 · Cited by 1,565
An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration
Figueiredo, M. A. T., & Nowak, R. D. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.814255 · Cited by 1,219
Polarimetric SAR interferometry
Cloude, S. R., & Papathanassiou, K. P. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.718859 · Cited by 1,197
First demonstration of airborne SAR tomography using multibaseline L-band data
Reigber, A., & Moreira, A. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.868873 · Cited by 1,065
Baraniuk, R., & Steeghs, P. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Radar Conference · doi:10.1109/radar.2007.374203 · Cited by 889
Metadata
- Authors
- Budillon, A., Evangelista, A., & Schirinzi, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 488-499
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2063522293
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 35.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-Dimensional SAR Focusing From Multipass Signals Using Compressive Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2054099
- The paper
- Budillon, A., Evangelista, A., & Schirinzi, G. (2011). Three-Dimensional SAR Focusing From Multipass Signals Using Compressive Sampling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2010.2054099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.