The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Discriminative Metric Learning Based Anomaly Detection Method
Abstract
Due to the high spectral resolution, anomaly detection from hyperspectral images provides a new way to locate potential targets in a scene, especially those targets that are spectrally different from the majority of the data set. Conventional Mahalanobis-distance-based anomaly detection methods depend on the background statistics to construct the anomaly detection metric. One of the main problems with these methods is that the Gaussian distribution assumption of the background may not be reasonable. Furthermore, these methods are also susceptible to contamination of the conventional background covariance matrix by anomaly pixels. This paper proposes a new anomaly detection method by effectively exploiting a robust anomaly degree metric for increasing the separability between anomaly pixels and other background pixels, using discriminative information. First, the manifold feature is used so as to divide the pixels into the potential anomaly part and the potential background part. This procedure is called discriminative information learning. A metric learning method is then performed to obtain the robust anomaly degree measurements. Experiments with three hyperspectral data sets reveal that the proposed method outperforms other current anomaly detection methods. The sensitivity of the method to several important parameters is also investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation
Xu, Y., Wu, Z., Li, J., Plaza, A., & Wei, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2493201 · Cited by 602
Graph and Total Variation Regularized Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Cheng, T., & Wang, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2936609 · Cited by 266
Hyperspectral anomaly detection with robust graph autoencoders
Fan, G., Ma, Y., Mei, X., Fan, F., Huang, J., & Ma, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3097097 · Cited by 212
Jiang, T., Li, Y., Xie, W., & Du, Q. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2020.2965961 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Du, B., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6844-6857
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2037034832
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 55.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.