The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Saliency-Guided Unsupervised Feature Learning for Scene Classification
Abstract
Due to the rapid technological development of various different satellite sensors, a huge volume of high-resolution image data sets can now be acquired. How to efficiently represent and recognize the scenes from such high-resolution image data has become a critical task. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised feature learning framework for scene classification. By using the saliency detection algorithm, we extract a representative set of patches from the salient regions in the image data set. These unlabeled data patches are exploited by an unsupervised feature learning method to learn a set of feature extractors which are robust and efficient and do not need elaborately designed descriptors such as the scale-invariant-feature-transform-based algorithm. We show that the statistics generated from the learned feature extractors can characterize a complex scene very well and can produce excellent classification accuracy. In order to reduce overfitting in the feature learning step, we further employ a recently developed regularization method called “dropout,” which has proved to be very effective in image classification. In the experiments, the proposed method was applied to two challenging high-resolution data sets: the UC Merced data set containing 21 different aerial scene categories with a submeter resolution and the Sydney data set containing seven land-use categories with a 60-cm spatial resolution. The proposed method obtained results that were equal to or even better than the previous best results with the UC Merced data set, and it also obtained the highest accuracy with the Sydney data set, demonstrating that the proposed unsupervised-feature-learning-based scene classification method provides more accurate classification results than the other latent-Dirichlet-allocation-based methods and the sparse coding method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification
Nowak, E., Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744085_38 · Cited by 927
Shin, H.-C., Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., Doran, S. J., & Leach, M. O. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.277 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art
Cheng, G., Han, J., & Lu, X. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2675998 · Cited by 2,926
AID: A benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification
Xia, G.-S., Hu, J., Hu, F., Shi, B., Bai, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Lu, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2685945 · Cited by 2,372
Self-citationHuang, B., Zhao, B., & Song, Y. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050 · Cited by 591
Deep semantic understanding of high resolution remote sensing image
Qu, B., Li, X., Tao, D., & Lu, X. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS) · doi:10.1109/cits.2016.7546397 · Cited by 350
Gong, M., Yang, H., & Zhang, P. (2017) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.001 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2175-2184
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2086866337
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 70.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saliency-Guided Unsupervised Feature Learning for Scene Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2357078
- The paper
- Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L. (2015). Saliency-Guided Unsupervised Feature Learning for Scene Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2357078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.