The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey on Spectral–Spatial Classification Techniques Based on Attribute Profiles
Abstract
Just over a decade has passed since the concept of morphological profile was defined for the analysis of remote sensing images. Since then, the morphological profile has largely proved to be a powerful tool able to model spatial information (e.g., contextual relations) of the image. However, due to the shortcomings of using the morphological profiles, many variants, extensions, and refinements of its definition have appeared stating that the morphological profile is still under continuous development. In this case, recently introduced theoretically sound attribute profiles (APs) can be considered as a generalization of the morphological profile, which is a powerful tool to model spatial information existing in the scene. Although the concept of the AP has been introduced in remote sensing only recently, an extensive literature on its use in different applications and on different types of data has appeared. To that end, the great amount of contributions in the literature that address the application of the AP to many tasks (e.g., classification, object detection, segmentation, change detection, etc.) and to different types of images (e.g., panchromatic, multispectral, and hyperspectral) proves how the AP is an effective and modern tool. The main objective of this survey paper is to recall the concept of the APs along with all its modifications and generalizations with special emphasis on remote sensing image classification and summarize the important aspects of its efficient utilization while also listing potential future works.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ghamisi, P., Yokoya, N., Li, J., Liao, W., Liu, S., Plaza, J., Rasti, B., & Plaza, A. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762087 · Cited by 909
Self-citationHe, L., Li, J., Liu, C., & Li, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2765364 · Cited by 630
Ghamisi, P., Maggiori, E., Li, S., Souza, R., Tarablaka, Y., Moser, G., De Giorgi, A., Fang, L., Chen, Y., Chi, M., et al. (2018) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2018.2854840 · Cited by 325
Self-citationSpectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Image Based on Deep Auto-Encoder
Ma, X., Wang, H., & Geng, J. (2016) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2016.2517204 · Cited by 258
Classification of Hyperspectral Images by Gabor Filtering Based Deep Network
Kang, X., Li, C., Li, S., & Lin, H. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2017.2767185 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghamisi, P., Dalla Mura, M., & Benediktsson, J. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2335-2353
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2106277226
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Spectral–Spatial Classification Techniques Based on Attribute Profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2358934
- The paper
- Ghamisi, P., Dalla Mura, M., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2015). A Survey on Spectral–Spatial Classification Techniques Based on Attribute Profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2358934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.