Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 826

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Convex Formulation for Hyperspectral Image Superresolution via Subspace-Based Regularization

Open access
Simoes, Miguel, Bioucas-Dias, Jose, Almeida, Luis B., Chanussot, Jocelyn·2015·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Hyperspectral remote sensing images (HSIs) usually have high spectral resolution and low spatial resolution. Conversely, multispectral images (MSIs) usually have low spectral and high spatial resolutions. The problem of inferring images that combine the high spectral and high spatial resolutions of HSIs and MSIs, respectively, is a data fusion problem that has been the focus of recent active research due to the increasing availability of HSIs and MSIs retrieved from the same geographical area. We formulate this problem as the minimization of a convex objective function containing two quadratic data-fitting terms and an edge-preserving regularizer. The data-fitting terms account for blur, different resolutions, and additive noise. The regularizer, a form of vector total variation, promotes piecewise-smooth solutions with discontinuities aligned across the hyperspectral bands. The downsampling operator accounting for the different spatial resolutions, the nonquadratic and nonsmooth nature of the regularizer, and the very large size of the HSI to be estimated lead to a hard optimization problem. We deal with these difficulties by exploiting the fact that HSIs generally “live” in a low-dimensional subspace and by tailoring the split augmented Lagrangian shrinkage algorithm (SALSA), which is an instance of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), to this optimization problem, by means of a convenient variable splitting. The spatial blur and the spectral linear operators linked, respectively, with the HSI and MSI acquisition processes are also estimated, and we obtain an effective algorithm that outperforms the state of the art, as illustrated in a series of experiments with simulated and real-life data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2014.2375320

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 826

Metadata

Authors
Simoes, M., Bioucas-Dias, J., Almeida, L. B., & Chanussot, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2015-06
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
3373-3388
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2021046129
Cited by
826
References
4
FWCI
42.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Convex Formulation for Hyperspectral Image Superresolution via Subspace-Based Regularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2375320
The paper
Simoes, M., Bioucas-Dias, J., Almeida, L. B., & Chanussot, J. (2015). A Convex Formulation for Hyperspectral Image Superresolution via Subspace-Based Regularization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2375320

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.