Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Ranking-Based Clustering Approach for Hyperspectral Band Selection

Jia, Sen, Tang, Guihua, Zhu, Jiasong, Li, Qingquan·2016·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Through imaging the same spatial area by hyperspectral sensors at different spectral wavelengths simultaneously, the acquired hyperspectral imagery often contains hundreds of band images, which provide the possibility to accurately analyze and identify a ground object. However, due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficient labeled training samples in practice, the high number of spectral bands unavoidably leads to the problem of a “dimensionality disaster” (also called the Hughes phenomenon), and dimensionality reduction should be applied. Concerning band (or feature) selection, conventional methods choose the representative bands by ranking the bands with defined metrics (such as non-Gaussianity) or by formulating the band selection problem as a clustering procedure. Because of the different but complementary advantages of the two kinds of methods, it can be beneficial to use both methods together to accomplish the band selection task. Recently, a fast density-peak-based clustering (FDPC) algorithm has been proposed. Based on the computation of the local density and the intracluster distance of each point, the product of the two factors is sorted in decreasing order, and cluster centers are recognized as points with anomalously large values; hence, the FDPC algorithm can be considered a ranking-based clustering method. In this paper, the FDPC algorithm has been enhanced to make it suitable for hyperspectral band selection. First, the ranking score of each band is computed by weighting the normalized local density and the intracluster distance rather than equally taking them into account. Second, an exponential-based learning rule is employed to adjust the cutoff threshold for a different number of selected bands, where it is fixed in the FDPC. The proposed approach is thus named the enhanced FDPC (E-FDPC). Furthermore, an effective strategy, which is called the isolated-point-stopping criterion, is developed to automatically determine the appropriate number of bands to be selected. That is, the clustering process will be stopped by the emergence of an isolated point (the only point in one cluster). Experimental results on three real hyperspectral data demonstrate that the bands selected by our E-FDPC approach could achieve higher classification accuracy than the FDPC and other state-of-the-art band selection techniques, whereas the isolated-point-stopping criterion is a reasonable way to determine the preferable number of bands to be selected.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2015.2450759

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Jia, S., Tang, G., Zhu, J., & Li, Q.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2016-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
88-102
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W1932531222
Cited by
372
References
53
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Ranking-Based Clustering Approach for Hyperspectral Band Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2450759
The paper
Jia, S., Tang, G., Zhu, J., & Li, Q. (2016). A Novel Ranking-Based Clustering Approach for Hyperspectral Band Selection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2450759

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.