Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generative Adversarial Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Zhu, Lin, Chen, Yushi, Ghamisi, Pedram, Benediktsson, Jon Atli·2018·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

A generative adversarial network (GAN) usually contains a generative network and a discriminative network in competition with each other. The GAN has shown its capability in a variety of applications. In this paper, the usefulness and effectiveness of GAN for classification of hyperspectral images (HSIs) are explored for the first time. In the proposed GAN, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is designed to discriminate the inputs and another CNN is used to generate so-called fake inputs. The aforementioned CNNs are trained together: the generative CNN tries to generate fake inputs that are as real as possible, and the discriminative CNN tries to classify the real and fake inputs. This kind of adversarial training improves the generalization capability of the discriminative CNN, which is really important when the training samples are limited. Specifically, we propose two schemes: 1) a well-designed 1D-GAN as a spectral classifier and 2) a robust 3D-GAN as a spectral-spatial classifier. Furthermore, the generated adversarial samples are used with real training samples to fine-tune the discriminative CNN, which improves the final classification performance. The proposed classifiers are carried out on three widely used hyperspectral data sets: Salinas, Indiana Pines, and Kennedy Space Center. The obtained results reveal that the proposed models provide competitive results compared to the state-of-the-art methods. In addition, the proposed GANs open new opportunities in the remote sensing community for the challenging task of HSI classification and also reveal the huge potential of GAN-based methods for the analysis of such complex and inherently nonlinear data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2805286

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. arjovsky, 2017, Wasserstein GAN
  2. maas, 2013, Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML), 1
  3. 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2751559 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2017.2751559
  4. yang, 2007, LLE-PLS nonlinear modeling method for near infrared spectroscopy and its application, Spectrosc Spectral Anal, 27, 1955
  5. mirza, 2014, Conditional generative adversarial nets

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, L., Chen, Y., Ghamisi, P., & Benediktsson, J. A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2018-09
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
5046-5063
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2791006446
Cited by
734
References
51
FWCI
52.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61771171)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of Key International Cooperation (61720106002)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generative Adversarial Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2018.2805286
The paper
Zhu, L., Chen, Y., Ghamisi, P., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2018). Generative Adversarial Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2018.2805286

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.