Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time-Series Retrieval of Soil Moisture Using CYGNSS

Al-Khaldi, Mohammad M., Johnson, Joel T., O'Brien, Andrew J., Balenzano, Anna, Mattia, Francesco·2019·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Time-series retrievals of soil moisture obtained from the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) constellation are presented. The retrieval approach assumes that vegetation and roughness changes occur on timescales longer than those associated with soil moisture changes to allow soil moisture sensing in the presence of vegetation and surface roughness contributions as well as the varying incidence angles associated with spaceborne Global Navigation Satellite System-Reflectometry (GNSS-R) systems. The approach is focused on incoherent scattering from land surfaces due to the expectation that coherent land surface returns arise primarily from inland water body contributions that are not directly representative of soil moisture. An approach for discarding coherent CYGNSS measurements is therefore developed and described. Because the approach requires the retrieval of N temporal soil moisture samples at a given location but uses only N-1 ratios of CYGNSS measured quantities, ancillary information is incorporated in the retrieval through the use of maximum and minimum monthly soil moisture maps obtained from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. Retrieved soil moistures are presented for the 6-month period December 2017-May 2018 and are compared against values reported by the SMAP mission. The comparisons suggest that there exists the potential for using spaceborne GNSS-R systems for global soil moisture retrievals with an rms error on the order of 0.04 cm3…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2890646

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bistatic radar data contains signatures that have been used for wide-ranging Earth Science applications, including measuring ocean surface wind speeds, soil moisture, inland water body mapping, river width and surface slope estimation.

    “The bistatic radar data contains signatures that have been used for wide-ranging Earth Science applications, including measuring ocean surface wind speeds [4], soil moisture [5][6][7], inland water body mapping [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and river width [16] and surface slope [17] estimation.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 2016, CYGNSS Handbook Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System Deriving Surface Wind Speeds in Tropical Cyclones
  2. 10.1109/8.277216 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2215574 · DOI
  4. 10.2529/PIERS090220054025 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2011631 · DOI
  6. 2018, SMAP Ancillary Data Set
  7. 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90057-D · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TGRS.2007.900682 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2052916 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2169454 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2741497 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2368585 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.015 · DOI
  15. 10.5194/hess-2017-152 · DOI
  16. al-khaldi, 2018, An analysis of CYGNSS returns over land, Proc USNC-URSI Nat Radio Sci Meeting
  17. 10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127544 · DOI
  18. 10.1029/2018GL078923 · DOI
  19. ruf, 2018, A new paradigm in earth environmental monitoring with the CYGNSS small satellite constellation, Nature, 8
  20. 10.1109/36.387598 · DOI
  21. 10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<1368:EOSVOS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2832981 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0022-1694(94)90236-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2004711 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TGRS.1985.289497 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.027 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2663768 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.021 · DOI
  29. 10.1175/2009JCLI2604.1 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2294133 · DOI
  31. 10.1175/JAS-D-11-027.1 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/2018GL077905 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/2016GL068189 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2242332 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/36.841977 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/cpa.3160040206 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.021 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2588467 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2565380 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.05.016 · DOI
  41. barrick, 1967, Scattering from surfaces with different roughness scales: Analysis and interpretation, Battelle Memorial Inst Pub, 10, 197a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Al-Khaldi, M. M., Johnson, J. T., O'Brien, A. J., Balenzano, A., & Mattia, F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2019-07
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
4322-4331
ISSN
  • 0196-2892
  • 1558-0644
Cited by
234
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review