Cited by 46Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Spatial Constraint and Total Variation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Feng, Ruyi, Li, Hao, Wang, Lizhe, Zhong, Yanfei, Zhang, Liangpei, Zeng, Tieyong·2022·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Hyperspectral anomaly detection, which is aimed at locating anomaly, has received widespread attention. In this article, a new anomaly detector, named local spatial constraint and total variation (LSC-TV), is proposed for hyperspectral imagery. In anomaly detection methods based on low-rank representation, background pixels are usually considered to have a global low-dimensional structure. However, the complex background distribution in hyperspectral images (HSIs) means that this global low-dimensional structure rarely occurs. In LSC-TV, the effective local spatial information is extracted by superpixel segmentation, and the regularization based on the F-norm is used to force the background within the same superpixel to show uniform spectral features. Moreover, each pixel is given a penalty based on the degree of anomaly determined during model iteration, while the anomaly is not considered by the background constraint. In addition, the background pixels in the neighborhood often show a high correlation, whereas the anomaly does not possess this feature. Nonisotropic TV is introduced into the proposed LSC model using the correlation of first-order neighborhoods to make it easier for anomalies to be separated. The proposed LSC-TV method and current state-of-the-art methods are tested on a set of simulated data and four sets of real data. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is superior to the comparative method in terms of both color map detection and…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3098814

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1109/MGRS.2013.2244672 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2871782 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2997863 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/MSP.2013.2278992 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/79.974724 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2956159 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2315772 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2870123 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2700329 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/29.60107 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2238609 · DOI
  12. 10.1117/12.920387 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/AERO.2004.1367963 · DOI
  14. 10.1117/12.773444 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2302446 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2081677 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00101-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TGRS.2004.841487 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.873019 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TSP.2019.2922157 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2936308 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437073 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2616649 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/1970392.1970395 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351663 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2479299 · DOI
  27. Liu, Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation, 663
  28. 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2493201 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2818159 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2872590 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.044 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.019 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/rs10101639 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2862899 · DOI
  35. 10.1117/12.2280456 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2593463 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.030 · DOI
  38. Wright, Robust principal component analysis: Exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization, 2080
  39. Lin, Linearized alternating direction method with adaptive penalty for low-rank representation, 612
  40. 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2439031 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2380313 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238308 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · DOI
  45. 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/bf01581204 · DOI
  47. 10.1137/050626090 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.88 · DOI
  49. 10.1109/LGRS.2008.915928 · DOI
  50. 10.1109/83.913593 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/rs11131578 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Feng, R., Li, H., Wang, L., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Zeng, T.
Affiliations
  • China University of Geosciences (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2022
Volume
60
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W3195044646
Cited by
46
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41925007, 41701429, U1711266)
  • Hong Kong Scholars Program (XJ2020025)
  • Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response (2020(B)003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
hyperspectral anomaly detection, total variation regularization, superpixel segmentation, low-rank representation, background modeling, anomaly localization, hyperspectral imagery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review