The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local Spatial Constraint and Total Variation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Abstract
Hyperspectral anomaly detection, which is aimed at locating anomaly, has received widespread attention. In this article, a new anomaly detector, named local spatial constraint and total variation (LSC-TV), is proposed for hyperspectral imagery. In anomaly detection methods based on low-rank representation, background pixels are usually considered to have a global low-dimensional structure. However, the complex background distribution in hyperspectral images (HSIs) means that this global low-dimensional structure rarely occurs. In LSC-TV, the effective local spatial information is extracted by superpixel segmentation, and the regularization based on the F-norm is used to force the background within the same superpixel to show uniform spectral features. Moreover, each pixel is given a penalty based on the degree of anomaly determined during model iteration, while the anomaly is not considered by the background constraint. In addition, the background pixels in the neighborhood often show a high correlation, whereas the anomaly does not possess this feature. Nonisotropic TV is introduced into the proposed LSC model using the correlation of first-order neighborhoods to make it easier for anomalies to be separated. The proposed LSC-TV method and current state-of-the-art methods are tested on a set of simulated data and four sets of real data. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is superior to the comparative method in terms of both color map detection and…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the complex distribution of the actual background in real HSIs is difficult to describe with a simple specific model; thus, the accuracies of the above model-based anomaly detectors are limited.”
From Background Reconstruction via 3D-Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection
Li, W., & Du, Q. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2343955 · Cited by 758
Graph and Total Variation Regularized Low-Rank Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Cheng, T., & Wang, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2019.2936609 · Cited by 266
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1109/MGRS.2013.2244672 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2871782 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2997863 · DOI
- 10.1109/MSP.2013.2278992 · DOI
- 10.1109/79.974724 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2956159 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2315772 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2870123 · DOI
- 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2700329 · DOI
- 10.1109/29.60107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2238609 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.920387 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2004.1367963 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.773444 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2302446 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2081677 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00101-2 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2004.841487 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2006.873019 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSP.2019.2922157 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2936308 · DOI
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437073 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2616649 · DOI
- 10.1145/1970392.1970395 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351663 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2479299 · DOI
- Liu, Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation, 663
- 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2493201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2818159 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2872590 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.019 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs10101639 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2862899 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.2280456 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2593463 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.030 · DOI
- Wright, Robust principal component analysis: Exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices via convex optimization, 2080
- Lin, Linearized alternating direction method with adaptive penalty for low-rank representation, 612
- 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2439031 · DOI
- 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2380313 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238308 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JMIV.0000011321.19549.88 · DOI
- 10.1007/bf01581204 · DOI
- 10.1137/050626090 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.88 · DOI
- 10.1109/LGRS.2008.915928 · DOI
- 10.1109/83.913593 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs11131578 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background Reconstruction via 3D-Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Wu, Z., & Wang, B. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15184592 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, R., Li, H., Wang, L., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Zeng, T.
- Affiliations
- China University of Geosciences (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W3195044646
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41925007, 41701429, U1711266)
- Hong Kong Scholars Program (XJ2020025)
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response (2020(B)003)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- hyperspectral anomaly detection, total variation regularization, superpixel segmentation, low-rank representation, background modeling, anomaly localization, hyperspectral imagery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review