Cited by 3Remote Sensing in AgricultureRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationSmart Agriculture and AI

A Deep Learning Method for Field Boundary Delineation From Remote Sensing Imagery With High Boundary Connectivity

Zhu, Yu, Pan, Yaozhong, Hu, Tangao, Liu, Yao·2025·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Accurate delineation of agricultural field boundaries from remote sensing imagery is fundamental for precision agriculture and policy-making. However, existing deep learning methods struggle with this task due to the difficulty of balancing semantic context with fine detail. Their unique imaging features (e.g., intricate linear nature, frequent occlusions) further challenge the detection of continuous boundaries. To address these issues, we propose a High Connectivity and Accuracy Field Boundary Network (HCFNet). HCFNet employs a novel two-stage framework where a lightweight region segmentation task provides explicit semantic constraints to a dedicated boundary delineation task. The boundary task is powered by an enhanced edge network featuring four key innovations: a Linearly Connected Deformable Convolution (LCDConv) to capture fine boundary morphology, a Non-Local Operation (NLO) to resolve local ambiguities using global context, a Continuity Restoration Decoder (CRD) that expands the receptive field and bridge occluded segments, and a Hierarchical Attention Fusion Module (HAFM) for adaptive multi-scale feature fusion. We conducted extensive experiments on diverse datasets, including high-resolution Gaofen-1, Google Earth, UAV imagery, and the global FTW benchmark. HCFNet consistently outperformed state-of-the-art models, achieving superior boundary accuracy (F1 score) and significantly improved connectivity. Our results demonstrate that HCFNet provides a robust and efficient solution for field boundary delineation, with its specialized modules proving particularly valuable in data-scarce scenarios common in practical applications. The code for HCFNet is available at (https://github.com/BNU-zhu/HCFNet).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2025.3628397

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y., Pan, Y., Hu, T., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2025
Volume
63
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W4415821247
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFB3906200, 2023YFB3906201)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (42192580, 42192581)
  • Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science and Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products (OF202401)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
two-stage segmentation, deformable convolution, non-local operations, occlusion handling, multi-scale feature fusion, precision agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review