Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of a Decision-Based Invocation Strategy for Adaptive Support for Air Traffic Control

IJtsma, Martijn, Borst, Clark, van Paassen, Marinus M., Mulder, Max·2022·IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/thms.2022.3208817

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 1986, NASA Task Load Index User Manual v 1 0
  2. 10.1080/14639220210124111 · DOI
  3. 10.1207/s15327108ijap0304_2 · DOI
  4. 10.2514/atcq.9.4.311 · DOI
  5. 2020, Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC) Annual Rep 2019
  6. 10.1109/THMS.2019.2919742 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3023886 · DOI
  8. lee, 0, Development and validation of the controller acceptance rating scale (CARS), Proc 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Manage RD Seminar, 1
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021383 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2035301 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/08995600902768800 · DOI
  12. lillo, 0, Coupling and complexity of interaction of STCA networks, Proc Eurocontrol Conf 8th Innov Res Workshop Exhib, 1
  13. 10.1109/SMC.2014.6974381 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/6979.898217 · DOI
  15. reinhardt, 0, Increasing capacity or productivity with controller assistance tools in high complexity airspace, Proc IEEE/AIAA 34th Digit Avionics Syst Conf, 1b6-1
  16. 10.1109/ICNS50378.2020.9223018 · DOI
  17. kuenz, 0, The 5th dimension in conflict management—XYZT capability, Proc IEEE/AIAA 34th Digit Avionics Syst Conf, 1a5-1
  18. 10.1518/001872007X197017 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4684-2523-9_24 · DOI
  20. 10.2514/atcq.22.2.115 · DOI
  21. 10.1518/106480409X435943 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.014 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0018720812443983 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2026428 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/THMS.2016.2618004 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/THMS.2015.2482480 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/THMS.2019.2903402 · DOI
  28. ijtsma, 0, Adaptive automation based on air traffic controller decision-making, Proc Int Symp Aviation Psych, 461
  29. hilburn, 1997, The effect of adaptive air traffic control (ATC) decision aiding on controller mental workload, Human-Automation Interaction Research and Practice, 84
  30. scallen, 1994, Pilot performance and preferences for cycles of automation in adaptive function allocation, Human Performance in Automated Systems Current Research and Trends, 154
  31. 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50103-5 · DOI
  32. 10.2514/1.C035852 · DOI
  33. munro, 1985, Instruction intrusiveness in dynamic simulation training, J Computer Based Instruction, 12, 50
  34. 10.1080/1463922021000054335 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90003-9 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
IJtsma, M., Borst, C., van Paassen, M. M., & Mulder, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Published
2022-12
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1135-1146
ISSN
  • 2168-2291
  • 2168-2305
Cited by
13
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review