The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Review of Stability Criteria for DC Power Distribution Systems
Abstract
Power-electronics-based dc power distribution systems, consisting of several interconnected feedback-controlled switching converters, suffer from potential degradation of stability and dynamic performance caused by negative incremental impedances due to the presence of constant power loads. For this reason, the stability analysis of these systems is a significant design consideration. This paper reviews all the major stability criteria for dc distribution systems that have been developed so far: the Middlebrook Criterion, the Gain Margin and Phase Margin Criterion, the Opposing Argument Criterion, the Energy Source Analysis Consortium (ESAC) Criterion, and the Three-Step Impedance Criterion. In particular, the paper discusses, for each criterion, the artificial conservativeness characteristics in the design of dc distribution systems, and the formulation of design specifications that ensure system stability. Moreover, the Passivity-Based Stability Criterion is discussed, which has been recently proposed as an alternative stability criterion. While all prior stability criteria are based on forbidden regions for the polar plot of the so-called minor loop gain, which is an impedance ratio, the proposed criterion is based on imposing passivity of the overall bus impedance. A meaningful simulation example is presented to illustrate the main characteristics of the reviewed stability criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Input filter considerations in design and application of switching regulators.
Middlebrook, R. D. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,180
Emadi, A., Khaligh, A., Rivetta, C. H., & Williamson, G. A. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2006.877483 · Cited by 934
DC distribution for industrial systems: opportunities and challenges
Baran, M. E., & Mahajan, N. R. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2003.818969 · Cited by 582
Impedance specifications for stable DC distributed power systems
Feng, X., Liu, J., & Lee, F. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/63.988825 · Cited by 582
A method of defining the load impedance specification for a stable distributed power system
Wildrick, C. M., Lee, F. C., Cho, B. H., & Choi, B. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/63.387992 · Cited by 520
A method of defining the load impedance specification for a stable distributed power system
Wildrick, C. M., Lee, F. C., Cho, B. H., & Choi, B. (2002) · Proceedings of IEEE Power Electronics Specialist Conference - PESC '93 · doi:10.1109/pesc.1993.472017 · Cited by 401
Riccobono, A., & Santi, E. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2012.2229686 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Cited by
Review on Control of DC Microgrids
Meng, L., Shafiee, Q., Ferrari Trecate, G., Karimi, H., Fulwani, D., Lu, X., & Guerrero, J. M. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2017.2690219 · Cited by 513
Jayawardana, I., Ho, C. N. M., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2021.3093303 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Riccobono, A., & Santi, E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3525-3535
- ISSN
- 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9367
- OpenAlex
- W2324070260
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Review of Stability Criteria for DC Power Distribution Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tia.2014.2309800
- The paper
- Riccobono, A., & Santi, E. (2014). Comprehensive Review of Stability Criteria for DC Power Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2014.2309800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.