Cited by 70Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

State-of-Charge Estimation of Li-ion Battery Using Gated Recurrent Unit With One-Cycle Learning Rate Policy

Hannan, Mahammad A., How, Dickson N. T., Mansor, Muhamad Bin, Hossain Lipu, Md S., Ker, Pin, Muttaqi, Kashem·2021·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

Deep learning has gained much traction in application to state-of-charge (SOC) estimation for Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle applications. However, with the vast selection of architectures and hyperparameter combinations, it remains challenging to design an accurate and robust SOC estimation model with a sufficiently low computation cost. Therefore, this study provides a comparative evaluation among commonly used deep learning models from the recurrent, convolutional, and feedforward architecture benchmarked on an openly available Li-ion battery dataset. To evaluate model robustness and generalization capability, we train and test models on different drive cycles at various temperatures and compute the root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error metric. To evaluate model computation costs, we run models in real-time and record the model size, floating-point operations per second (FLOPS), and run-time duration per datapoint. This study proposes a two-hidden layer stacked gated recurrent unit model trained with a one-cycle policy learning rate scheduler. The proposed model achieves a minimum RMSE of 0.52% on the train dataset and 0.65% on the test dataset while maintaining a relatively low computation cost. Executing the proposed model in real-time takes up approximately 1 MB in disk space, 300K FLOPS, and 0.03 ms run-time per datapoint. This makes the proposed model feasible to be executed on lightweight battery management system processors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2021.3065194

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 70

Authors
Hannan, M. A., How, D. N. T., Mansor, M. B., Hossain Lipu, M. S., Ker, P., & Muttaqi, K.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2021-05
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
2964-2971
ISSN
  • 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9367
OpenAlex
W3137292479
Cited by
70
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (20190101LRGS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, gated recurrent unit, electric vehicles, battery management systems, real-time inference, computational cost, driving cycles, temperature effects, model comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review