Cited by 19Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSmart Grid Security and ResilienceNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Grid Using Incremental ML With Adaptive Moment Estimation

Nie, Zhijie, Basumallik, Sagnik, Banerjee, P., Srivastava, Anurag K.·2024·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

Abstract

A novel online and adaptive machine-learning approach for network intrusion detection is proposed in this work with a use case of unknown attack detection in the industrial cyber-physical power grid. Existing machine-learning (ML) based-intrusion detection systems in cyber-physical power systems rely on a fixed dataset with known attack anomalies for training. These approaches can lead topoor detection accuracyas unknown cyber-attacks target the system. As a result, these ML approaches need to bere-trained from scratch. This research proposes an adaptive network intrusion detection technique that identifies anomalies in industrial cyber-power grids and is capable of detecting unknown attacks with significant accuracy. The proposed intrusion detector, a neural network with adaptive moment estimation, incorporates anadaptive incremental learningwhen exposed to a new vulnerability. It can be deployed at the device level in the phasor measurement network systems and evolves with the latest knowledge-base of cyber threats. The proposed approach is validated using a real cyber-physical simulation environment consisting of real-time digital simulator, multiple hardware phasor measurement units, and a network simulator under two different scenarios of unknown attacks, and extensive analysis is performed for different network architecture, training epochs, choice of loss functions, and the volume of data utilized. Results show that the incremental approach improves the accuracy of brute-force attacks to$>99.9\%$and penetration-test attacks to 63.7%. Further, the applicability of our method is validated on two publicly available datasets where incremental learning improved DDoS attack detection accuracy to 97.7%, UDP attacks to 73.1%, DoS attacks to 99% and Scan attacks to 94.2%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ticps.2024.3413607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 19

Metadata

Authors
Nie, Z., Basumallik, S., Banerjee, P., & Srivastava, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems
Published
2024
Volume
2
Pages
206-219
ISSN
2832-7004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399562947
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (FW-HTF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
Keywords
network intrusion detection, incremental learning, Adam optimizer, unknown attack detection, anomaly detection, phasor measurement units, brute force attacks, penetration testing, DDoS attacks, denial-of-service attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review