The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Effective Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbines
Open accessAbstract
Cost-effective wind turbine (WT) condition monitoring assumes more importance as turbine sizes increase and they are placed in more remote locations, for example, offshore. Conventional condition monitoring techniques, such as vibration, lubrication oil, and generator current signal analysis, require the deployment of a variety of sensors and computationally intensive analysis techniques. This paper describes a WT condition monitoring technique that uses the generator output power and rotational speed to derive a fault detection signal. The detection algorithm uses a continuous-wavelet-transform-based adaptive filter to track the energy in the prescribed time-varying fault-related frequency bands in the power signal. The central frequency of the filter is controlled by the generator speed, and the filter bandwidth is adapted to the speed fluctuation. Using this technique, fault features can be extracted, with low calculation times, from direct- or indirect-drive fixed- or variable-speed WTs. The proposed technique has been validated experimentally on a WT drive train test rig. A synchronous or induction generator was successively installed on the test rig, and both mechanical and electrical fault like perturbations were successfully detected when applied to the test rig.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines
Tavner, P. J. (2008) · IET Electric Power Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-epa:20070280 · Cited by 531
Self-citation
Cited by
Wavelet transform based on inner product in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review
Chen, J., Li, Z., Pan, J., Chen, G., Zi, Y., Yuan, J., Chen, B., & He, Z. (2016) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.08.023 · Cited by 517
A review of wind turbine bearing condition monitoring: State of the art and challenges
de Azevedo, H. D. M., Araújo, A. M., & Bouchonneau, N. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.032 · Cited by 382
An Overview on Fault Diagnosis, Prognosis and Resilient Control for Wind Turbine Systems
Gao, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9020300 · Cited by 281
Leite, V. C. M. N., Borges da Silva, J. G., Veloso, G. F. C., Borges da Silva, L. E., Lambert-Torres, G., Bonaldi, E. L., & de Lacerda de Oliveira, L. E. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2345330 · Cited by 274
Igba, J., Alemzadeh, K., Durugbo, C., & Eiriksson, E. T. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.006 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, W., Tavner, P. J., Crabtree, C. J., & Wilkinson, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-271
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108657028
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-Effective Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2009.2032202
- The paper
- Yang, W., Tavner, P. J., Crabtree, C. J., & Wilkinson, M. (2010). Cost-Effective Condition Monitoring for Wind Turbines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2009.2032202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.