Cited by 98Sensorless Control of Electric MotorsElectric Motor Design and AnalysisElectric Power Systems and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Torque Control Strategy of Polyphase Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines With Minimal Controller Reconfiguration Under Open-Circuit Fault of One Phase

Abstract

This paper deals with the torque control of polyphase segment surface-mounted-permanent-magnet synchronous machines. First, we introduce a Lagrangian formulation for computing the optimal sinusoidal currents allowing to develop a given torque, both in normal operation mode and in fault operation mode (loss of one phase). Then, we present a torque control architecture allowing to switch from normal to fault operation mode with a minimum reconfiguration of the controller. All the theoretical results are validated by simulation and experiments on a test bench.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2011.2170393

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control strategies for open-phase fault of multiphase motors focus on minimization of torque ripples and the principle of unchanged magnetomotive force before and after the fault.

    “All these solutions were proposed for open-phase fault of the multiphase motors and were focused on the minimization of the torque ripples and the principle of unchanged magnetomotive force before and after the fault.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. sneessens, 2009, Model and torque control of a five phase PMSM synchronous motor using tooth concentrated windings technology, Proc 8th Int Symp Adv Electromech Motion Syst Electromotion, 1
  2. iordanidis, 2010, An overview of modelling and simulation activities for an all-electric nose wheel electric system, Proc Int Conf Recent Adv Aerosp Actuation Syst Compon, 137
  3. rezaei, 2008, A comprehensive comparison between non-segment and segment polyphase permanent magnet excited synchronous machine, Proc Int Conf Electrical Machines (ICEM)

Metadata

Authors
Baudart, F., Dehez, B., Matagne, E., Telteu-Nedelcu, D., Alexandre, P., & Labrique, F.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Sociétés Anonyme Belge de Constructions Aéronautiques (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2012-06
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
2632-2644
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2144526394
Cited by
98
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Motor Design and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power Systems and Control
Keywords
torque control, surface-mounted permanent magnets, open-circuit fault, phase loss, Lagrangian formulation, control reconfiguration, fault-tolerant operation, switched reluctance motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review