Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Networked Industrial Sensing Systems
Abstract
Reliable real-time sensing plays a vital role in ensuring the reliability and safety of industrial cyber-physical systems (CPSs) such as wireless sensor and actuator networks. For many reasons, such as harsh industrial environments, fault-prone sensors, or malicious attacks, sensor readings may be abnormal or faulty. This could lead to serious system performance degradation or even catastrophic failure. Current anomaly detection approaches are either centralized and complicated or restricted due to strict assumptions, which are not suitable for practical large-scale networked industrial sensing systems (NISSs), where sensing devices are connected via digital communications, such as wireless sensor networks or smart grid systems. In this paper, we introduce a fully distributed general anomaly detection (GAD) scheme, which uses graph theory and exploits spatiotemporal correlations of physical processes to carry out real-time anomaly detection for general large-scale NISSs. We formally prove the scalability of our GAD approach and evaluate the performance of GAD for two industrial applications: building structure monitoring and smart grids. Extensive trace-driven simulations validate our theoretical analysis and demonstrate that our approach can significantly outperform state-of-the-art approaches in terms of detection accuracy and efficiency.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2694469 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
VT-ADL: A Vision Transformer Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localization
Mishra, P., Verk, R., Fornasier, D., Piciarelli, C., & Foresti, G. L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) · doi:10.1109/isie45552.2021.9576231 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
“A system which can perform this task in an intelligent way is hugely in demand, as its applications range from video surveillance [1] to defect segmentation [2], [3], inspection [2], quality control [4], medical imagining [5], financial transactions [6] etc.”
BackgroundImage Anomaly Detection with Capsule Networks and Imbalanced Datasets
Piciarelli, C., Mishra, P., & Foresti, G. L. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30642-7_23 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, P.-Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3832-3842
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2037660732
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
- Keywords
- distributed anomaly detection, real-time anomaly detection, industrial cyber-physical systems, wireless sensor networks, smart grid, graph anomaly detection, spatio-temporal correlation, scalability, sensor fault detection, malicious attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review