Cited by 148Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFault Detection and Control SystemsDistributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms

Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Networked Industrial Sensing Systems

Chen, Po-Yu, Yang, Shusen, McCann, Julie A.·2015·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

Reliable real-time sensing plays a vital role in ensuring the reliability and safety of industrial cyber-physical systems (CPSs) such as wireless sensor and actuator networks. For many reasons, such as harsh industrial environments, fault-prone sensors, or malicious attacks, sensor readings may be abnormal or faulty. This could lead to serious system performance degradation or even catastrophic failure. Current anomaly detection approaches are either centralized and complicated or restricted due to strict assumptions, which are not suitable for practical large-scale networked industrial sensing systems (NISSs), where sensing devices are connected via digital communications, such as wireless sensor networks or smart grid systems. In this paper, we introduce a fully distributed general anomaly detection (GAD) scheme, which uses graph theory and exploits spatiotemporal correlations of physical processes to carry out real-time anomaly detection for general large-scale NISSs. We formally prove the scalability of our GAD approach and evaluate the performance of GAD for two industrial applications: building structure monitoring and smart grids. Extensive trace-driven simulations validate our theoretical analysis and demonstrate that our approach can significantly outperform state-of-the-art approaches in terms of detection accuracy and efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2014.2350451

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, P.-Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. A.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2015-06
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
3832-3842
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2037660732
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Keywords
distributed anomaly detection, real-time anomaly detection, industrial cyber-physical systems, wireless sensor networks, smart grid, graph anomaly detection, spatio-temporal correlation, scalability, sensor fault detection, malicious attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review