Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Analysis on Conducted CM EMI Emission of Motor Drives: WBG Versus Si Devices

Han, Di, Li, Silong, Wu, Yujiang, Choi, Wooyoung, Sarlioglu, Bulent·2017·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs and gallium nitride (GaN) high-electron mobility transistors are perceived as future replacements for Si IGBTs and MOSFETs in medium- and low-voltage drives due to their low conduction and switching losses. However, it is widely believed that the already significant conducted common-mode (CM) electromagnetic interference (EMI) emission of motor drives will be further exacerbated by the high-speed switching operation of these new devices. Hence, this paper investigates and quantifies the increase in the conducted CM EMI emission of a pulse width modulation inverter-based motor drive when SiC and GaN devices are adopted. Through an analytical approach, the results reveal that the influence of dv/dt on the conducted CM emission is generally limited. On the other hand, the influence of switching frequency is more significant. Lab tests are also conducted to verify the analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2017.2681968

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • A Survey of Wide Bandgap Power Semiconductor Devices

    Millán, J., Godignon, P., Perpiñà, X., Pérez-Tomás, A., & Rebollo, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2268900 · Cited by 2,685 · cited 1×

    “W IDE bandgap (WBG) semiconductor-based switching devices, such as silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETs and gallium nitride (GaN) high-electron mobility transistor (HEMTs), have proven to be superior to the state-of-the-art Si technology in terms of low-loss and high-temperature performance [1]–[5].”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Han, D., Li, S., Wu, Y., Choi, W., & Sarlioglu, B.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2017-10
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
8353-8363
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2596529426
Cited by
297
References
1
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Analysis on Conducted CM EMI Emission of Motor Drives: WBG Versus Si Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2017.2681968
The paper
Han, D., Li, S., Wu, Y., Choi, W., & Sarlioglu, B. (2017). Comparative Analysis on Conducted CM EMI Emission of Motor Drives: WBG Versus Si Devices. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2681968

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.