The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive Integral Sliding Mode Control With Time-Delay Estimation for Robot Manipulators
Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive robust controller for robot manipulators using adaptive integral sliding mode control and time-delay estimation (TDE). The proposed controller employs TDE to estimate robot dynamics with uncertainties such as parameter variations and disturbances, an integral sliding surface to eliminate the reaching phase together with the noise-sensitive switching action used in the conventional sliding mode control, and adaptation gain dynamics to achieve the applicable high accuracy. Experimental studies using a programmable universal machine for assembly-type industrial robot manipulator are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control. The proposed controller is robust, chattering free, and highly accurate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van, M., Mavrovouniotis, M., & Ge, S. S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2017.2782246 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Chang, P. H., & Jin, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6796-6804
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2608224837
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Integral Sliding Mode Control With Time-Delay Estimation for Robot Manipulators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2017.2698416
- The paper
- Lee, J., Chang, P. H., & Jin, M. (2017). Adaptive Integral Sliding Mode Control With Time-Delay Estimation for Robot Manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2698416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
