The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on a Double-Convolutional Neural Network Architecture
Abstract
Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction has been increasingly considered in many industrial fields for the reliability and safety of their systems. As a data analysis tool of deep learning, deep convolutional neural network (CNN) shows great potential for RUL prediction. This paper proposes an intelligent RUL prediction method based on a double-CNN model architecture. Given the powerful feature extraction capability of CNN, the proposed method is fed with original vibration signals with no need to resort to any feature extractor, which can also retain the useful information in maximum. The prediction includes two stages: first, incipient fault point is identified by the first CNN model and a proposed “3/5” principle; then, the second CNN model is constructed for RUL prediction. In practice, RULs of identical components are different from each other, which poses a major challenge in RUL prediction. To overcome this problem, an intermediate reliability variable is first calculated in this paper, instead of directly predicting the RUL value. Then, a mapping algorithm is proposed to map reliability to RUL. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, data of four tests of bearing degradation are utilized for RUL prediction. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, the proposed method shows higher prediction accuracy and robustness. The prediction results and evaluation indexes demonstrated the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Action Recognition
Ji, S., Xu, W., Yang, M., & Yu, K. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.59 · Cited by 6,235
A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method
Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2774777 · Cited by 2,222 · cited 1×
“CNN based on LeNet-5 is proposed for fault diagnosis, which converts signals into two-dimensional (2-D) images and then extracts features from these images to eliminate the effect of handcrafted features [21].”
MethodArtificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review
Liu, R., Yang, B., Zio, E., & Chen, X. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.016 · Cited by 2,188
Self-citationA recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings
Guo, L., Li, N., Jia, F., Lei, Y., & Lin, J. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045 · Cited by 1,231
Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review
Hameed, Z., Hong, Y. S., Cho, Y. M., Ahn, S. H., & Song, C. K. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.008 · Cited by 995
Chen, F.-C., & Jahanshahi, M. R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2764844 · Cited by 930
Cited by
Guo, F., Wu, X., Liu, L., Ye, J., Wang, T., Fu, L., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.126880 · Cited by 159
Zhou, J., Qin, Y., Luo, J., & Zhu, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3218665 · Cited by 98
Pei, H., Si, X., Li, T., Zhang, Z., & Lei, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3310482 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, B., Liu, R., & Zio, E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9521-9530
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2956342231
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 25.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on a Double-Convolutional Neural Network Architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2019.2924605
- The paper
- Yang, B., Liu, R., & Zio, E. (2019). Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on a Double-Convolutional Neural Network Architecture. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2019.2924605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.