Cited by 76Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFault Detection and Control SystemsElectrical Fault Detection and Protection

Fault Feature Extractor Based on Bootstrap Your Own Latent and Data Augmentation Algorithm for Unlabeled Vibration Signals

Peng, Tengyi, Shen, Changqing, Sun, Shilong, Wang, Dong·2022·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

Given that vibration fault signals collected from industrial circumstances are usually insufficient and have no labels, supervised learning networks cannot be directly applied to recognize fault types in this case. Hence, automatic feature extraction of unlabeled data is urgently needed. In this study, an automatic fault feature extractor (AFFE) based on the contrastive learning algorithm—Bootstrap Your Own Latent (BYOL) network, which can extract fault features automatically without needing labeled information—is proposed. A data augmentation method for vibration signals is studied because it is critical to the contrastive learning algorithm. This study determines a data augmentation combination that can help AFFE achieve excellent performance in extracting features from unlabeled bearing fault data. To verify the validity of the proposed method, we utilize some labeled data (5% of samples with labels in a dataset) to fit linear classifiers, which are combined with the proposed AFFE to extract a feature. The aim is to predict the accuracy score of feature classification for the remaining data. The case study demonstrates that the fault features extracted using AFFE can achieve a high accuracy score of 94.81%. Therefore, the proposed AFFE-BYOL is a promising diagnostic fault feature extraction scheme to process unlabeled vibrational data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2021.3111567

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some works comprehensively compare and study augmentation methods and further evaluate the performance on different tasks.

    “Therefore, some works comprehensively compare and study the augmentation methods and further evaluate the performance on different tasks [45], [119]-[121].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, T., Shen, C., Sun, S., & Wang, D.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Soochow University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2022-09
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
9547-9555
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W3200230256
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration (MSV202104)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875375, 51975355)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
Keywords
vibration fault diagnosis, unlabeled data, automatic feature extraction, contrastive learning, data augmentation, bearing fault classification, self-supervised learning, vibration signals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review