The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Forensic detection of image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints
Abstract
As the use of digital images has increased, so has the means and the incentive to create digital image forgeries. Accordingly, there is a great need for digital image forensic techniques capable of detecting image alterations and forged images. A number of image processing operations, such as histogram equalization or gamma correction, are equivalent to pixel value mappings. In this paper, we show that pixel value mappings leave behind statistical traces, which we shall refer to as a mapping's intrinsic fingerprint, in an image's pixel value histogram. We then propose forensic methods for detecting general forms globally and locally applied contrast enhancement as well as a method for identifying the use of histogram equalization by searching for the identifying features of each operation's intrinsic fingerprint. Additionally, we propose a method to detect the global addition of noise to a previously JPEG-compressed image by observing that the intrinsic fingerprint of a specific mapping will be altered if it is applied to an image's pixel values after the addition of noise. Through a number of simulations, we test the efficacy of each proposed forensic technique. Our simulation results show that aside from exceptional cases, all of our detection methods are able to correctly detect the use of their designated image processing operation with a probability of 99% given a false alarm probability of 7% or less.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237
A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer
Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security · doi:10.1145/2909827.2930786 · Cited by 838
Self-citationGalbally, J., Marcel, S., & Fierrez, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2292332 · Cited by 613
Bayar, B., & Stamm, M. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2825953 · Cited by 599
Self-citationInformation Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stamm, M. C., & Liu, K. J. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 492-506
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2158071928
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forensic detection of image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2010.2053202
- The paper
- Stamm, M. C., & Liu, K. J. R. (2010). Forensic detection of image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2010.2053202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.