The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ensemble Classifiers for Steganalysis of Digital Media
Abstract
Today, the most accurate steganalysis methods for digital media are built as supervised classifiers on feature vectors extracted from the media. The tool of choice for the machine learning seems to be the support vector machine (SVM). In this paper, we propose an alternative and well-known machine learning tool—ensemble classifiers implemented as random forests—and argue that they are ideally suited for steganalysis. Ensemble classifiers scale much more favorably w.r.t. the number of training examples and the feature dimensionality with performance comparable to the much more complex SVMs. The significantly lower training complexity opens up the possibility for the steganalyst to work with rich (high-dimensional) cover models and train on larger training sets—two key elements that appear necessary to reliably detect modern steganographic algorithms. Ensemble classification is portrayed here as a powerful developer tool that allows fast construction of steganography detectors with markedly improved detection accuracy across a wide range of embedding methods. The power of the proposed framework is demonstrated on three steganographic methods that hide messages in JPEG images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Cited by
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2190402 · Cited by 2,144
Self-citationUniversal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain
Holub, V., Fridrich, J., & Denemark, T. (2014) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1186/1687-417x-2014-1 · Cited by 1,202
Self-citationUsing deep transfer learning for image-based plant disease identification
Chen, J., Chen, J., Zhang, D., Sun, Y., & Nanehkaran, Y. A. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105393 · Cited by 1,052
Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networks
Uchida, Y., Nagai, Y., Sakazawa, S., & Satoh, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3078971.3078974 · Cited by 676
Content-Adaptive Steganography by Minimizing Statistical Detectability
Sedighi, V., Cogranne, R., & Fridrich, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2486744 · Cited by 573
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kodovsky, J., Fridrich, J., & Holub, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 432-444
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2124664712
- Cited by
- 1,064
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensemble Classifiers for Steganalysis of Digital Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2011.2175919
- The paper
- Kodovsky, J., Fridrich, J., & Holub, V. (2012). Ensemble Classifiers for Steganalysis of Digital Media. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2011.2175919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.