Cited by 98Gait Recognition and AnalysisHuman Pose and Action RecognitionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

A New View-Invariant Feature for Cross-View Gait Recognition

Kusakunniran, Worapan, Wu, Qiang, Zhang, Jian, Ma, Yi, Li, Hongdong·2013·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Human gait is an important biometric feature which is able to identify a person remotely. However, change of view causes significant difficulties for recognizing gaits. This paper proposes a new framework to construct a new view-invariant feature for cross-view gait recognition. Our view-normalization process is performed in the input layer (i.e., on gait silhouettes) to normalize gaits from arbitrary views. That is, each sequence of gait silhouettes recorded from a certain view is transformed onto the common canonical view by using corresponding domain transformation obtained through invariant low-rank textures (TILTs). Then, an improved scheme of procrustes shape analysis (PSA) is proposed and applied on a sequence of the normalized gait silhouettes to extract a novel view-invariant gait feature based on procrustes mean shape (PMS) and consecutively measure a gait similarity based on procrustes distance (PD). Comprehensive experiments were carried out on widely adopted gait databases. It has been shown that the performance of the proposed method is promising when compared with other existing methods in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2013.2252342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-view-based gait recognition is a popular approach for different visual angles, requires multiple fully controlled cameras and cooperative environments, and visually normalizes gait characteristics before combination.

    “Similarly, cross-view-based gait recognition is a popular approach used to deal with different visual angles. The input type requires multiple fully controlled cameras and cooperative environments, thus being restrained to real scenarios. Moreover, it visually normalizes gait characteristics before performing any combination, which allows the model to learn the relationships among visual movements”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [109]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kusakunniran, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2013-10
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1642-1653
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2063626761
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
cross-view gait recognition, Procrustes distance, biometric identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review