A New View-Invariant Feature for Cross-View Gait Recognition
Abstract
Human gait is an important biometric feature which is able to identify a person remotely. However, change of view causes significant difficulties for recognizing gaits. This paper proposes a new framework to construct a new view-invariant feature for cross-view gait recognition. Our view-normalization process is performed in the input layer (i.e., on gait silhouettes) to normalize gaits from arbitrary views. That is, each sequence of gait silhouettes recorded from a certain view is transformed onto the common canonical view by using corresponding domain transformation obtained through invariant low-rank textures (TILTs). Then, an improved scheme of procrustes shape analysis (PSA) is proposed and applied on a sequence of the normalized gait silhouettes to extract a novel view-invariant gait feature based on procrustes mean shape (PMS) and consecutively measure a gait similarity based on procrustes distance (PD). Comprehensive experiments were carried out on widely adopted gait databases. It has been shown that the performance of the proposed method is promising when compared with other existing methods in the literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cross-view-based gait recognition is a popular approach for different visual angles, requires multiple fully controlled cameras and cooperative environments, and visually normalizes gait characteristics before combination.
“Similarly, cross-view-based gait recognition is a popular approach used to deal with different visual angles. The input type requires multiple fully controlled cameras and cooperative environments, thus being restrained to real scenarios. Moreover, it visually normalizes gait characteristics before performing any combination, which allows the model to learn the relationships among visual movements”
From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [109]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust gait recognition: a comprehensive survey
Rida, I., Almaadeed, N., & Almaadeed, S. (2019) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5063 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Wang, X., & Yan, W. Q. (2020) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065719500278 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
Filipi Gonçalves dos Santos, C., Oliveira, D. D. S., A. Passos, L., Gonçalves Pires, R., Felipe Silva Santos, D., Pascotti Valem, L., P. Moreira, T., Cleison S. Santana, M., Roder, M., Paulo Papa, J., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3490235 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Robust Cross-View Gait Recognition with Evidence: A Discriminant Gait GAN (DiGGAN) Approach
Hu, B., Guan, Y., Gao, Y., Long, Y., Lane, N., & Ploetz, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10493 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kusakunniran, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1642-1653
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2063626761
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- cross-view gait recognition, Procrustes distance, biometric identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review