Related Key Chosen IV Attack on Grain-128a Stream Cipher
Abstract
The well-known stream cipher Grain-128 is a variant version of Grain v1 with 128-bit secret key. Grain v1 is a stream cipher which has successfully been chosen as one of seven finalists by European eSTREAM project. Yet Grain-128 is vulnerable against some recently introduced attacks. A new version of Grain-128 with authentication, named Grain-128a, is proposed by Ågren, Hell, Johansson, and Meier. The designers claimed that Grain-128a is strengthened against all known attacks and observations on the original Grain-128. So far there exists no attack on Grain-128a except a differential fault attack by Banik, Maitra, and Sarkar. In this paper, we give some observations on Grain-128a, and then propose a related key chosen IV attack on Grain-128a based on these observations. Our attack can recover the 128-bit secret key of Grain-128a with a computational complexity of$2^{96.322} $, requiring$2^{96} $chosen IVs and$2^{103.613} $keystream bits. The success probability of our attack is 0.632. This related key attack is “minimal” in the sense that it only requires two related keys. The result shows that our attack is much better than an exhaustive key search in the related key setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are weaknesses in the initialization procedure of all members of the Grain family and Sprout.
“There are weaknesses in the initialization procedure of all members of the Grain family [4,14] and Sprout [18,33].”
From Fruit-80: A Secure Ultra-Lightweight Stream Cipher for Constrained Environments (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fruit-80: A Secure Ultra-Lightweight Stream Cipher for Constrained Environments
Amin Ghafari, V., & Hu, H. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20030180 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Although some attacks have been applied to Grain-128a [13,14], it is still good from the practical point of view.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Ding, L., & Guan, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 803-809
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2170960580
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
- Keywords
- Grain stream cipher, related-key attacks, key recovery, stream cipher cryptanalysis, eSTREAM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review