The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DAC-MACS: Effective Data Access Control for Multiauthority Cloud Storage Systems
Abstract
Data access control is an effective way to ensure data security in the cloud. However, due to data outsourcing and untrusted cloud servers, the data access control becomes a challenging issue in cloud storage systems. Existing access control schemes are no longer applicable to cloud storage systems, because they either produce multiple encrypted copies of the same data or require a fully trusted cloud server. Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption (CP-ABE) is a promising technique for access control of encrypted data. However, due to the inefficiency of decryption and revocation, existing CP-ABE schemes cannot be directly applied to construct a data access control scheme for multiauthority cloud storage systems, where users may hold attributes from multiple authorities. In this paper, we propose data access control for multiauthority cloud storage (DAC-MACS), an effective and secure data access control scheme with efficient decryption and revocation. Specifically, we construct a new multiauthority CP-ABE scheme with efficient decryption, and also design an efficient attribute revocation method that can achieve both forward security and backward security. We further propose an extensive data access control scheme (EDAC-MACS), which is secure under weaker security assumptions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In previous studies, various secure EHR systems have been proposed [14,38,39].”
From Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology. (2017) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
The NIST definition of cloud computing
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-145 · Cited by 12,637
Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data
Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. R. (2006) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/1180405.1180418 · Cited by 5,149
Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption
Bethencourt, J., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP '07) · doi:10.1109/sp.2007.11 · Cited by 5,131
Fuzzy Identity-Based Encryption
Sahai, A., & Waters, B. R. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11426639_27 · Cited by 4,626
Waters, B. R. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19379-8_4 · Cited by 1,997
Lewko, A., Okamoto, T., Sahai, A., Takashima, K., & Waters, B. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_4 · Cited by 1,313
Decentralizing Attribute-Based Encryption
Lewko, A. B., & Waters, B. R. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_31 · Cited by 1,206
Li, M., Yu, S., Zheng, Y. R., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.97 · Cited by 1,189
Self-citationRevocation and Tracing Schemes for Stateless Receivers
Naor, D., Naor, M., & Lotspiech, J. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44647-8_3 · Cited by 1,128
Multi-authority Attribute Based Encryption
Chase, M. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70936-7_28 · Cited by 1,112
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- jahid, 2011, Easier: Encryption-based access control in social networks with efficient revocation, Proc ASIACCS'11, 411
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–310 of 310
Performance analysis of the proxy-based and collusion-resistant revocable CPABE framework
Chawla, S., & Gupta, N. (2024) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v35.i1.pp378-387
Multi-Authorization Center Attribute-Based Encryption Scheme Based on Internet of Things
Hao, X., Da, L., Huang, Z., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs61882.2024.10602920
“In the current research on attribute-based encryption schemes for IoT [4-7] , literature [8] proposes a scheme for fine-grained access control under the premise of ensuring data privacy in a smart healthcare environment, but the research scheme is not carried out under a multi-authorization center…”
BackgroundYang, X., & Tao, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Information Security and Privacy · doi:10.4018/ijisp.365602
Risk Register Automation using Stacked Generalization
Punya, R. (2025) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem49221
Verifiable Predicate-based Access Control Encryption with Dynamic Revocation
Zhang, C., Jiang, P., Zhang, Z., et al. (2025) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc65282.2025.11059613
“First is the re-vocation plan of authority [18]–[20].”
Dynamic Access Control Scheme Based on Single Sign-On in Cloud Storage
Xiong, G., Li, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc65529.2025.11148866
“Basic steps are similar to scheme [16].”
ABS-PoNR: Attribute-Based Signature scheme with Proof of Non-Revocation
Goel, S., Gupta, M. K., & Kumari, S. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit251117126
Sethi, K., & Dhal, K. (2026) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-025-05800-4
Revocable Data Sharing Scheme Without Ciphertext Update for VANETs
Wang, L., Zhong, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.3673723
Dynamic attribute-based encryption for secure data sharing in cloud applications
Routray, K., & Bera, P. (2026) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2026.108671
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, K., Jia, X., Ren, K., Zhang, B., & Xie, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1790-1801
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2048543827
- Semantic Scholar
- e1d0cb7dd7ee1f019c478c076c6da59d5fef9177
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 32.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- data access control, ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption, attribute revocation, forward and backward security, encrypted data storage, decryption efficiency, data outsourcing, cloud security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
