Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hybrid Cooperative Beamforming and Jamming for Physical-Layer Security of Two-Way Relay Networks

Wang, Hui-Ming, Luo, Miao, Yin, Qinye, Xia, Xiang-Gen·2013·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a hybrid cooperative beamforming and jamming scheme to enhance the physical-layer security of a single-antenna-equipped two-way relay network in the presence of an eavesdropper. The basic idea is that in both cooperative transmission phases, some intermediate nodes help to relay signals to the legitimate destination adopting distributed beamforming, while the remaining nodes jam the eavesdropper, simultaneously, which takes the data transmissions in both phases under protection. Two different schemes are proposed, with and without the instantaneous channel state information of the eavesdropper, respectively, and both are subjected to the more practical individual power constraint of each cooperative node. Under the general channel model, it is shown that both problems can be transformed into a semi-definite programming (SDP) problem with an additional rank-1 constraint. A current state of the art technique for handling such a problem is the semi-definite relaxation (SDR) and randomization techniques. In this paper, however, we propose a penalty function method incorporating the rank-1 constraint into the objective function. Although the so-obtained problem is not convex, we develop an efficient iterative algorithm to solve it. Each iteration is a convex SDP problem, thus it can be efficiently solved using the interior point method. When the channels are reciprocal such as in TDD mode, we show that the problems become second-order convex cone programming ones. Numerical evaluation results are provided and analyzed to show the properties and efficiency of the proposed hybrid security scheme, and also demonstrate that our optimization algorithms outperform the SDR technique.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2013.2287046

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems

    Shannon, C. E. (1949) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb00928.x · Cited by 9,440 · cited 1×

    “This work was supported in part by the NSFC under Grants 61102081 and 61221063, in part by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant 20110201120013, in part by the New Century Excellent Talents Support Fund under Grant NCET-13-0458, in part by…”
    Method

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H.-M., Luo, M., Yin, Q., & Xia, X.-G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2013-12
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
2007-2020
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2086006789
Cited by
228
References
1
FWCI
19.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Cooperative Beamforming and Jamming for Physical-Layer Security of Two-Way Relay Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2013.2287046
The paper
Wang, H.-M., Luo, M., Yin, Q., & Xia, X.-G. (2013). Hybrid Cooperative Beamforming and Jamming for Physical-Layer Security of Two-Way Relay Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2013.2287046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.