Cited by 192Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

Designing an Efficient Image Encryption-Then-Compression System via Prediction Error Clustering and Random Permutation

Zhou, Jiantao, Liu, Xianming, Au, Oscar C., Tang, Yuan Yan·2014·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

In many practical scenarios, image encryption has to be conducted prior to image compression. This has led to the problem of how to design a pair of image encryption and compression algorithms such that compressing the encrypted images can still be efficiently performed. In this paper, we design a highly efficient image encryption-then-compression (ETC) system, where both lossless and lossy compression are considered. The proposed image encryption scheme operated in the prediction error domain is shown to be able to provide a reasonably high level of security. We also demonstrate that an arithmetic coding-based approach can be exploited to efficiently compress the encrypted images. More notably, the proposed compression approach applied to encrypted images is only slightly worse, in terms of compression efficiency, than the state-of-the-art lossless/lossy image coders, which take original, unencrypted images as inputs. In contrast, most of the existing ETC solutions induce significant penalty on the compression efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2013.2291625

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Edge detection and pixelation serve to check the effectiveness of encryption.

    “Notice that a recent way of testing the effectiveness of encryption is to apply edge detection to the distorted frame [80] and pixelation also serves to check the effectiveness of the encryption.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 192

Authors
Zhou, J., Liu, X., Au, O. C., & Tang, Y. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2014-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
39-50
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2009460929
Cited by
192
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Keywords
image encryption, encryption-then-compression, random permutations, lossless image compression, lossy image compression, arithmetic coding, compression efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review