Designing an Efficient Image Encryption-Then-Compression System via Prediction Error Clustering and Random Permutation
Abstract
In many practical scenarios, image encryption has to be conducted prior to image compression. This has led to the problem of how to design a pair of image encryption and compression algorithms such that compressing the encrypted images can still be efficiently performed. In this paper, we design a highly efficient image encryption-then-compression (ETC) system, where both lossless and lossy compression are considered. The proposed image encryption scheme operated in the prediction error domain is shown to be able to provide a reasonably high level of security. We also demonstrate that an arithmetic coding-based approach can be exploited to efficiently compress the encrypted images. More notably, the proposed compression approach applied to encrypted images is only slightly worse, in terms of compression efficiency, than the state-of-the-art lossless/lossy image coders, which take original, unencrypted images as inputs. In contrast, most of the existing ETC solutions induce significant penalty on the compression efficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Edge detection and pixelation serve to check the effectiveness of encryption.
“Notice that a recent way of testing the effectiveness of encryption is to apply edge detection to the distorted frame [80] and pixelation also serves to check the effectiveness of the encryption.”
From Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams (2019) · cites this paper as [80]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 192
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Liu, X., Au, O. C., & Tang, Y. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Macau (MO)
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-50
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2009460929
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Keywords
- image encryption, encryption-then-compression, random permutations, lossless image compression, lossy image compression, arithmetic coding, compression efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review