The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contactless Palm Vein Recognition Using a Mutual Foreground-Based Local Binary Pattern
Abstract
Local binary pattern (LBP) is popular for the texture representation owing to its discrimination ability and computational efficiency, but when used to describe the sparse texture in palm vein images, the discrimination ability is diluted, leading to lower performance, especially for contactless palm vein matching. In this paper, an improved mutual foreground LBP method is presented for achieving a better matching performance for contactless palm vein recognition. First, the normalized gradient-based maximal principal curvature algorithm and k -means method are utilized for texture extraction, which can effectively suppress noise and improve accuracy and robustness. Then, an LBP matching strategy was adopted for similarity measurements on the basis of extracted palm veins and their neighborhoods, which include the vast majority of useful distinctive information for identification while eliminating interference by excluding the background. To further improve the LBP performance, the matched pixel ratio was adopted to determine the best matching region (BMR). Finally, the matching score obtained in the process of finding the BMR was fused with results of LBP matching at the score level to further improve the identification performance. A series of rigorous contrast experiments using the palm vein data set in the CASIA multispectral palmprint image database were conducted. The obtained low equal error rate (0.267%) and comparisons with the most state-of-the-art approaches demonstrate that our method is feasible and effective for contactless palm vein recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Face Recognition with Local Binary Patterns
Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., & Pietikäinen, M. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24670-1_36 · Cited by 2,462
Cited by
Multi-Factor Authentication: A Survey
Ometov, A., Bezzateev, S., Mäkitalo, N., Andreev, S., Mikkonen, T., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2018) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography2010001 · Cited by 434
An Automated Biometric Identification System Using CNN-Based Palm Vein Recognition
Jhong, S.-Y., Tseng, P.-Y., Siriphockpirom, N., Hsia, C.-H., Huang, M.-S., Hua, K.-L., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2020) · 2020 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS) · doi:10.1109/aris50834.2020.9205778 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, W., & Wu, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1974-1985
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2031337792
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contactless Palm Vein Recognition Using a Mutual Foreground-Based Local Binary Pattern. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2014.2361020
- The paper
- Kang, W., & Wu, Q. (2014). Contactless Palm Vein Recognition Using a Mutual Foreground-Based Local Binary Pattern. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2014.2361020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.