The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Secure Biometrics-Based Multi-Server Authentication Protocol Using Smart Cards
Abstract
Recently, in 2014, He and Wang proposed a robust and efficient multi-server authentication scheme using biometrics-based smart card and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC). In this paper, we first analyze He-Wang's scheme and show that their scheme is vulnerable to a known session-specific temporary information attack and impersonation attack. In addition, we show that their scheme does not provide strong user's anonymity. Furthermore, He-Wang's scheme cannot provide the user revocation facility when the smart card is lost/stolen or user's authentication parameter is revealed. Apart from these, He-Wang's scheme has some design flaws, such as wrong password login and its consequences, and wrong password update during password change phase. We then propose a new secure multi-server authentication protocol using biometric-based smart card and ECC with more security functionalities. Using the Burrows-Abadi-Needham logic, we show that our scheme provides secure authentication. In addition, we simulate our scheme for the formal security verification using the widely accepted and used automated validation of Internet security protocols and applications tool, and show that our scheme is secure against passive and active attacks. Our scheme provides high security along with low communication cost, computational cost, and variety of security features. As a result, our scheme is very suitable for battery-limited mobile devices as compared with He-Wang's scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Password authentication with insecure communication
Lamport, L. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358790.358797 · Cited by 2,789
Cited by
Two birds with one stone: two-factor authentication with security beyond conventional bound
Wang, D., & Wang, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2016.2605087 · Cited by 539
Provably Secure Authenticated Key Agreement Scheme for Smart Grid
Odelu, V., Das, A. K., Wazid, M., & Conti, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2602282 · Cited by 355
Self-citationSecure Message Communication Protocol Among Vehicles in Smart City
Dua, A., Kumar, N., Das, A. K., & Susilo, W. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2780183 · Cited by 180
Self-citationSecure and efficient user authentication scheme for multi-gateway wireless sensor networks
Srinivas, J., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Mishra, D. (2017) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.11.002 · Cited by 158
Improved ECC-Based Three-Factor Multiserver Authentication Scheme
Wu, T.-Y., Yang, L., Lee, Z., Chen, C.-M., Pan, J.-S., & Islam, S. H. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/6627956 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Odelu, V., Das, A. K., & Goswami, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1953-1966
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W1498573661
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Secure Biometrics-Based Multi-Server Authentication Protocol Using Smart Cards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2015.2439964
- The paper
- Odelu, V., Das, A. K., & Goswami, A. (2015). A Secure Biometrics-Based Multi-Server Authentication Protocol Using Smart Cards. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2015.2439964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.