The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discriminant Correlation Analysis: Real-Time Feature Level Fusion for Multimodal Biometric Recognition
Abstract
Information fusion is a key step in multimodal biometric systems. The fusion of information can occur at different levels of a recognition system, i.e., at the feature level, matching-score level, or decision level. However, feature level fusion is believed to be more effective owing to the fact that a feature set contains richer information about the input biometric data than the matching score or the output decision of a classifier. The goal of feature fusion for recognition is to combine relevant information from two or more feature vectors into a single one with more discriminative power than any of the input feature vectors. In pattern recognition problems, we are also interested in separating the classes. In this paper, we present discriminant correlation analysis (DCA), a feature level fusion technique that incorporates the class associations into the correlation analysis of the feature sets. DCA performs an effective feature fusion by maximizing the pairwise correlations across the two feature sets and, at the same time, eliminating the between-class correlations and restricting the correlations to be within the classes. Our proposed method can be used in pattern recognition applications for fusing the features extracted from multiple modalities or combining different feature vectors extracted from a single modality. It is noteworthy that DCA is the first technique that considers class structure in feature fusion. Moreover, it has a very low computational complexity and it can be employed in real-time applications. Multiple sets of experiments performed on various biometric databases and using different feature extraction techniques, show the effectiveness of our proposed method, which outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557 · cited 3×
“Parallel feature fusion [7], [8] does not show a more discriminative feature either and in case of Gabor-SURF fusion, the fused feature vector works almost similar to the SURF feature vector.”
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Martinez, A. M., & Kak, A. C. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908974 · Cited by 3,249
Cited by
Multimodal Gesture Recognition Based on the ResC3D Network
Miao, Q., Li, Y., Ouyang, W., Ma, Z., Xu, X., Shi, W., & Cao, X. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.360 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Haghighat, M., Abdel-Mottaleb, M., & Alhalabi, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1984-1996
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2405680777
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 52.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminant Correlation Analysis: Real-Time Feature Level Fusion for Multimodal Biometric Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2016.2569061
- The paper
- Haghighat, M., Abdel-Mottaleb, M., & Alhalabi, W. (2016). Discriminant Correlation Analysis: Real-Time Feature Level Fusion for Multimodal Biometric Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2016.2569061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.