Cited by 396Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionAdvanced Data Compression Techniques

An efficient MSB prediction-based method for high-capacity reversible data hiding in encrypted images

Open access
Puteaux, Pauline, Puech, William·2018·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Reversible data hiding in encrypted images (RDHEI) is an effective technique to embed data in the encrypted domain. An original image is encrypted with a secret key and during or after its transmission, it is possible to embed additional information in the encrypted image, without knowing the encryption key or the original content of the image. During the decoding process, the secret message can be extracted and the original image can be reconstructed. In the last few years, RDHEI has started to draw research interest. Indeed, with the development of cloud computing, data privacy has become a real issue. However, none of the existing methods allow us to hide a large amount of information in a reversible manner. In this paper, we propose a new reversible method based on MSB (most significant bit) prediction with a very high capacity. We present two approaches, these are: high capacity reversible data hiding approach with correction of prediction errors and high capacity reversible data hiding approach with embedded prediction errors. With this method, regardless of the approach used, our results are better than those obtained with current state of the art methods, both in terms of reconstructed image quality and embedding capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2018.2799381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [94], PWLCM is adopted as the source producing PRNS, whose randomness is seriously compromised in a digital computer.

    “Interestingly, [94] adopts PWLCM as the source producing pseudo-random number sequence, whose randomness is seriously comprised in a digital computer [48].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puteaux, P., & Puech, W.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2018-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1670-1681
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2793696846
Cited by
396
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 8
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Keywords
reversible data hiding, encrypted images, prediction error correction, image encryption, data privacy, image reconstruction quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review