Cited by 26Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic DetectionPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security

Dispersed Pixel Perturbation-Based Imperceptible Backdoor Trigger for Image Classifier Models

Open access
Wang, Yulong, Zhao, Minghui, Li, Shenghong, Yuan, Xin, Ni, Wei·2022·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Typical deep neural network (DNN) backdoor attacks are based on triggers embedded in inputs. Existing imperceptible triggers are computationally expensive or low in attack success. In this paper, we propose a new backdoor trigger, which is easy to generate, imperceptible, and highly effective. The new trigger is a uniformly randomly generated three-dimensional (3D) binary pattern that can be horizontally and/or vertically repeated and mirrored and superposed onto three-channel images for training a backdoored DNN model. Dispersed throughout an image, the new trigger produces weak perturbation to individual pixels, but collectively holds a strong recognizable pattern to train and activate the backdoor of the DNN. We also analytically reveal that the trigger is increasingly effective with the improving resolution of the images. Experiments are conducted using the ResNet-18 and MLP models on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and BTSR datasets. In terms of imperceptibility, the new trigger outperforms existing triggers, such as BadNets, Trojaned NN, and Hidden Backdoor, by over an order of magnitude. The new trigger achieves an almost 100% attack success rate, only reduces the classification accuracy by less than 0.7%–2.4%, and invalidates the state-of-the-art defense techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2022.3202687

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 26

Authors
Wang, Y., Zhao, M., Li, S., Yuan, X., & Ni, W.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2022
Volume
17
Pages
3091-3106
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W4293704294
Cited by
26
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61921003)
  • China Scholarship Council (CSC) Scholarship (201906475002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Keywords
backdoor attacks, image classification, deep neural network, adversarial learning, backdoor defense evasion, ResNet-18, MNIST, CIFAR-10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review