Dispersed Pixel Perturbation-Based Imperceptible Backdoor Trigger for Image Classifier Models
Open accessAbstract
Typical deep neural network (DNN) backdoor attacks are based on triggers embedded in inputs. Existing imperceptible triggers are computationally expensive or low in attack success. In this paper, we propose a new backdoor trigger, which is easy to generate, imperceptible, and highly effective. The new trigger is a uniformly randomly generated three-dimensional (3D) binary pattern that can be horizontally and/or vertically repeated and mirrored and superposed onto three-channel images for training a backdoored DNN model. Dispersed throughout an image, the new trigger produces weak perturbation to individual pixels, but collectively holds a strong recognizable pattern to train and activate the backdoor of the DNN. We also analytically reveal that the trigger is increasingly effective with the improving resolution of the images. Experiments are conducted using the ResNet-18 and MLP models on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and BTSR datasets. In terms of imperceptibility, the new trigger outperforms existing triggers, such as BadNets, Trojaned NN, and Hidden Backdoor, by over an order of magnitude. The new trigger achieves an almost 100% attack success rate, only reduces the classification accuracy by less than 0.7%–2.4%, and invalidates the state-of-the-art defense techniques.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In trigger-based backdoor attacks, triggers are designed to be injected into the training data under the targeted label.
“In trigger-based backdoor attacks, triggers are designed to be injected into the training data under the targeted label [128], [166].”
From Data and model poisoning backdoor attacks on wireless federated learning, and the defense mechanisms: A comprehensive survey (2024) · cites this paper as [166]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Zhao, M., Li, S., Yuan, X., & Ni, W.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 3091-3106
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W4293704294
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61921003)
- China Scholarship Council (CSC) Scholarship (201906475002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Keywords
- backdoor attacks, image classification, deep neural network, adversarial learning, backdoor defense evasion, ResNet-18, MNIST, CIFAR-10
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review