The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IEC61850–Based Systems—Functional Testing and Interoperability Issues
Abstract
This paper presents a proposal for functional testing of protection and automation systems based on the IEC61850 standard. The proposed methodology is based on the development of tests scenarios which properly represent the actual systems and their operative conditions. It includes the selection of hardware and software that are used to simulate the operational events and acquire data for further analysis. This methodology was developed to evaluate the protection and automation systems of large-sized substations mainly regarding the interoperability between intelligent electronic devices of different manufacturers. This paper explains in detail the proposed methodology and an actual case study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“IEC 61850 [9,10,11,12,13,14] has become the de facto standard for substation communication within the smart grid.”
From Vulnerability and Impact Analysis of the IEC 61850 GOOSE Protocol in the Smart Grid (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1109/TDC.2002.1177718 · DOI
- 10.1109/PES.2006.1709286 · DOI
- 10.1109/PTC.2009.5282224 · DOI
- aguilar, 2010, Integration and testing challenges of IEC 61850 multivendor protection schemes, Proc 10th IET Int Conf Devel in Power Syst Protection Managing the Change, 1
- 10.1109/APAP.2011.6180593 · DOI
- yang, 2010, Protection performance testing in IEC 61850 based systems, Proc 10th IET Int Conf Devel in Power Syst Protection Managing the Change, 1
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2006.886788 · DOI
- apostolov, 2011, Nerc/ferc requirements impact on testing philosophy and reliability?Good or bad?, Proc 64th Annu Conf Protective Relay Eng, 334, 10.1109/CPRE.2011.6035635 · DOI
- 10.1109/90.282603 · DOI
- 10.1109/EFTA.2007.4416812 · DOI
- ferrari, 2011, Applying ptp-to-sntp time-gateway to IEC 61850 systems, Proc IEEE Conf on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 1
- 10.1109/MIAS.2010.939430 · DOI
- 2004, IRIG serial time code formats
- 10.1109/PEOCO.2011.5970443 · DOI
- 10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840174 · DOI
- 2011, ?NIST Special Publication 1108-NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards?Release 2 0 ?
- webb, 1988, automated testing of power system protection relays, Power Engineering Journal, 2, 291, 10.1049/pe:19880057 · DOI
- 1990, ISO/IEC International Standard ISO/IEC 9506-1 Industrial Automation Systems?Manufacturing Message Specification ISO/IEC
- 10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840228 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICPST.2008.4745389 · DOI
- 2005, I E Commission IEC 61850?Communication Networks and Systems in Substations IEC
- 2012, C TECHNOLOGIES WireShark
- 2012, IXIACOM AGILENT N2X Multiservice Test Solution
- 10.1145/944773.944783 · DOI
- java, 2012, IPTraf Network Monitoring Software
- turner, 2012, Tcpreplay
- 2008, IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems
- mills, 2010, Network Time Protocol Version 4 Protocol and Algorithms Specification RFC 5905 (Proposed Standard) Internet Engineering Task Force
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vulnerability and Impact Analysis of the IEC 61850 GOOSE Protocol in the Smart Grid
Reda, H. T., Ray, B., Peidaee, P., Anwar, A., Mahmood, A., Kalam, A., & Islam, N. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041554 · Cited by 80
“For SAS, IEC 61850 [9–14] has become the preferred communication standard because of its improved functionality and several communication requirements including scalability, high bandwidth, multi-vendor interoperability, and security support [4,6,11,22], which also motivated us to further assess the security vulnerabi…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Manassero, G., Pellini, E. L., Senger, E. C., & Nakagomi, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1436-1444
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2089062632
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Keywords
- IEC 61850, functional testing, interoperability, intelligent electronic devices, test scenarios, substation automation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
