The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Coupling Autoencoder for Fault Diagnosis With Multimodal Sensory Data
Abstract
Effective fault diagnosis of rotating machinery has multifarious benefits, such as improved safety, enhanced reliability, and reduced maintenance cost, for complex engineered systems. With many kinds of installed sensors for conducting fault diagnosis, one of the key tasks is to develop data fusion strategies that can effectively handle multimodal sensory signals. Most traditional methods use hand-crafted statistical features and then combine these multimodal features simply by concatenating them into a long vector to achieve data fusion. The present study proposes a deep coupling autoencoder (DCAE) model that handles the multimodal sensory signals not residing in a commensurate space, such as vibration and acoustic data, and integrates feature extraction of multimodal data seamlessly into data fusion for fault diagnosis. Specifically, a coupling autoencoder (CAE) is constructed to capture the joint information between different multimodal sensory data, and then a DCAE model is devised for learning the joint feature at a higher level. The CAE is developed by coupling hidden representations of two single-modal autoencoders, which can capture the joint information from multimodal data. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated by two experiments, which shows that the DCAE model succeeds in efficiently utilizing multisource sensory data to perform accurate fault diagnosis. Compared with other methods, the proposed method exhibits better performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., & Ding, S. X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2519325 · Cited by 1,191
Cited by
Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap
Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 · Cited by 2,997
Shao, H., Xia, M., Han, G., Zhang, Y., & Wan, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3005965 · Cited by 452
Multi-Sensor data fusion in intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machines: A comprehensive review
Kibrete, F., Engida Woldemichael, D., & Shimels Gebremedhen, H. (2024) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114658 · Cited by 270
Jiao, J., Zhao, M., Lin, J., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.017 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, M., Sun, C., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1137-1145
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2783074568
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Coupling Autoencoder for Fault Diagnosis With Multimodal Sensory Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2018.2793246
- The paper
- Ma, M., Sun, C., & Chen, X. (2018). Deep Coupling Autoencoder for Fault Diagnosis With Multimodal Sensory Data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2793246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.