Collaborative Energy Management Optimization Toward a Green Energy Local Area Network
Abstract
Rapid economic development has been observed worldwide, which has caused environmental problems to worsen. Thus, the Energy Internet (EI), which accesses renewable energy and provides high-quality power services, has recently become a hot issue. As a subnet of the EI, an energy local area network (ELAN) consists of renewable power generation equipment, controllable distributed power generation equipment, storage systems, electric vehicles, and a large number of loads. Energy management is required for economic, environmental, and safety considerations. This paper proposes an energy management optimization model that addresses ELAN operations and includes pollution treatment fees; this model provides intelligent control of the charging and discharging of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). This model achieves a nonlinear energy management optimization for an ELAN. To promote optimal performance, an improved comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization (CLPSO) algorithm is presented; it combines Tabu Search (TS) and CLPSO to avoid local optima. To verify the performance of our model, two experimental scenarios are built. The simulation results show that our energy management optimization model fulfills the optimal allocation of energy and that the PHEV intelligent charging/discharging strategy promotes economic benefits for the network.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Centralized methods for EV charging scheduling require the charging station to know the data of all EVs, which may violate the privacy of EV owners.
“However, the above methods require the charging station to know the data of all EVs, which may violate the privacy of EV owners.”
From Distributed Coordination of Charging Stations Considering Aggregate EV Power Flexibility (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distributed Coordination of Charging Stations Considering Aggregate EV Power Flexibility
Yan, D., Ma, C., & Chen, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2022.3213173 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“A centralized scheme based on improved particle swarm optimization was presented in [25] to schedule EVs’ charging for cost reduction.”
Method
- Authors
- Qi, J., Lai, C., Xu, B., Sun, Y., & Leung, K.-S.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5410-5418
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2785248992
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772286)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160910)
- Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (16KJB520034)
- Outstanding Youth of Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (BK20170100)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0202200)
- Jiangsu Key Research and Development Program (BE2017166)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- energy internet, energy management optimization, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, tabu search, renewable energy integration, distributed generation, energy storage systems, electric vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review