The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Double Auction-Based Resource Allocation for Mobile Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things
Abstract
Mobile edge computing (MEC) yields significant paradigm shift in industrial Internet of things (IIoT), by bringing resource-rich data center near to the lightweight IIoT mobile devices (MDs). In MEC, resource allocation and network economics need to be jointly addressed to maximize system efficiency and incentivize price-driven agents, whereas this joint problem is under the locality constraints, i.e., an edge server can only serve multiple IIoT MDs in the vicinity constrained by its limited computing resource. In this paper, we investigate the joint problem of network economics and resource allocation in MEC where IIoT MDs request offloading with claimed bids and edge servers provide their limited computing service with ask prices. Particularly, we propose two double auction schemes with dynamic pricing in MEC, namely a breakeven-based double auction (BDA) and a more efficient dynamic pricing based double auction (DPDA), to determine the matched pairs between IIoT MDs and edge servers, as well as the pricing mechanisms for high system efficiency, under the locality constraints. Through theoretical analysis, both algorithms are proved to be budget-balanced, individual profit, system efficient, and truthful. Extensive simulations have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms and the simulation results indicate that the proposed DPDA and BDA can significantly improve the system efficiency of MEC in IIoT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective
Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745201 · Cited by 5,607
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
Dynamic computation offloading for mobile-edge computing with energy harvesting devices
Mao, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2016) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2016.2611964 · Cited by 1,705
Cited by
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
Resource Scheduling in Edge Computing: A Survey
Luo, Q., Hu, S., Li, C., Li, G., & Shi, W. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3106401 · Cited by 588
“in [45] investigated joint resource allocation and network economics in edge computing.”
BackgroundDistributed Deep Learning Model for Intelligent Video Surveillance Systems with Edge Computing
Chen, J., Li, K., Deng, Q., Li, K., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2909473 · Cited by 253
Jahani, N., Sepehri, A., Vandchali, H. R., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147520 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, W., Liu, J., Yue, Y., & Zhang, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4692-4701
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2883959991
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double Auction-Based Resource Allocation for Mobile Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2018.2855746
- The paper
- Sun, W., Liu, J., Yue, Y., & Zhang, H. (2018). Double Auction-Based Resource Allocation for Mobile Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2855746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.