Differentially Private Asynchronous Federated Learning for Mobile Edge Computing in Urban Informatics
Abstract
Driven by technologies such as mobile edge computing and 5G, recent years have witnessed the rapid development of urban informatics, where a large amount of data is generated. To cope with the growing data, artificial intelligence algorithms have been widely exploited. Federated learning is a promising paradigm for distributed edge computing, which enables edge nodes to train models locally without transmitting their data to a server. However, the security and privacy concerns of federated learning hinder its wide deployment in urban applications such as vehicular networks. In this article, we propose a differentially private asynchronous federated learning scheme for resource sharing in vehicular networks. To build a secure and robust federated learning scheme, we incorporate local differential privacy into federated learning for protecting the privacy of updated local models. We further propose a random distributed update scheme to get rid of the security threats led by a centralized curator. Moreover, we perform the convergence boosting in our proposed scheme by updates verification and weighted aggregation. We evaluate our scheme on three real-world datasets. Numerical results show the high accuracy and efficiency of our proposed scheme, whereas preserve the data privacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Device heterogeneity can be preserved in a safe data training and evaluation environment.
“Device heterogeneity can be preserved in a safe data training and evaluation environment [175].”
From Federated learning-based AI approaches in smart healthcare: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and open issues (2023) · cites this paper as [175]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 387
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Huang, X., Dai, Y., Maharjan, S., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2134-2143
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2974175488
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 21.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1603261, 61602055)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- differentially private federated learning, asynchronous federated learning, mobile edge computing, urban informatics, vehicular networks, local differential privacy, convergence acceleration, weighted aggregation, resource sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review