The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variational LSTM Enhanced Anomaly Detection for Industrial Big Data
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing population of Industry 4.0, industrial big data (IBD) has become a hotly discussed topic in digital and intelligent industry field. The security problem existing in the signal processing on large scale of data stream is still a challenge issue in industrial internet of things, especially when dealing with the high-dimensional anomaly detection for intelligent industrial application. In this article, to mitigate the inconsistency between dimensionality reduction and feature retention in imbalanced IBD, we propose a variational long short-term memory (VLSTM) learning model for intelligent anomaly detection based on reconstructed feature representation. An encoder-decoder neural network associated with a variational reparameterization scheme is designed to learn the low-dimensional feature representation from high-dimensional raw data. Three loss functions are defined and quantified to constrain the reconstructed hidden variable into a more explicit and meaningful form. A lightweight estimation network is then fed with the refined feature representation to identify anomalies in IBD. Experiments using a public IBD dataset named UNSW-NB15 demonstrate that the proposed VLSTM model can efficiently cope with imbalance and high-dimensional issues, and significantly improve the accuracy and reduce the false rate in anomaly detection for IBD according to F1, area under curve (AUC), and false alarm rate (FAR).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894
Zuo, Y., Wu, Y., Min, G., Huang, C., & Pei, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2966615 · Cited by 94
Cited by
IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey
Chatterjee, A., & Ahmed, B. S. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568 · Cited by 323
A long short‐term memory‐based model for greenhouse climate prediction
Liu, Y., Li, D., Wan, S., Wang, F., Dou, W., Xu, X., Li, S., Ma, R., & Qi, L. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22620 · Cited by 209
Federated Intrusion Detection in Blockchain-Based Smart Transportation Systems
Abdel-Basset, M., Moustafa, N., Hawash, H., Razzak, I., Sallam, K. M., & Elkomy, O. M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3119968 · Cited by 161
Stacked one-class broad learning system for intrusion detection in industry 4.0
Yang, K., Shi, Y., Yu, Z., Yang, Q., Sangaiah, A. K., & Zeng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3157727 · Cited by 75
Federated Threat-Hunting Approach for Microservice-Based Industrial Cyber-Physical System
Abdel-Basset, M., Hawash, H., & Sallam, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3091150 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Liang, W., Ma, J., & Jin, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3469-3477
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W3086419524
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variational LSTM Enhanced Anomaly Detection for Industrial Big Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2020.3022432
- The paper
- Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Liang, W., Ma, J., & Jin, Q. (2021). Variational LSTM Enhanced Anomaly Detection for Industrial Big Data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.3022432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.