Cited by 195Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataTraffic control and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FASTGNN: A Topological Information Protected Federated Learning Approach for Traffic Speed Forecasting

Zhang, Chenhan, Zhang, Shuyu, Yu, James J. Q., Yu, Shui·2021·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Federated learning has been applied to various tasks in intelligent transportation systems to protect data privacy through decentralized training schemes. The majority of the state-of-the-art models in intelligent transportation systems (ITS) are graph neural networks (GNN)-based for spatial information learning. When applying federated learning to the ITS tasks with GNN-based models, the existing frameworks can only protect the data privacy; however, ignore the one of topological information of transportation networks. In this article, we propose a novel federated learning framework to tackle this problem. Specifically, we introduce a differential privacy-based adjacency matrix preserving approach for protecting the topological information. We also propose an adjacency matrix aggregation approach to allow local GNN-based models to access the global network for a better training effect. Furthermore, we propose a GNN-based model named attention-based spatial-temporal graph neural networks (ASTGNN) for traffic speed forecasting. We integrate the proposed federated learning framework and ASTGNN as FASTGNN for traffic speed forecasting. Extensive case studies on a real-world dataset demonstrate that FASTGNN can develop accurate forecasting under the privacy preservation constraint.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2021.3055283

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. cui, 2016, Deep stacked bidirectional and unidirectional lstm recurrent neural network for network-wide traffic speed prediction, 6th International Workshop on Urban Computing (UrbComp 2017)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Yu, J. J. Q., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2021-12
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
8464-8474
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W3126441351
Cited by
194
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 9
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • General Program of Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515011032)
  • Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain-Inspired Intelligent Computation (2020B121201001)
  • Australian (ARC DP200101374)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
federated learning, graph neural networks, traffic speed prediction, differential privacy, topological information, intelligent transportation systems, spatio-temporal graph neural networks, attention mechanism, data privacy, transportation networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review