Mitigating the Backdoor Attack by Federated Filters for Industrial IoT Applications
Abstract
The federated learning provides an effective solution to train collaborative models over a large scale of participated Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications with the help of a global server, building an intelligent life. However, the federated learning is vulnerable to the backdoor attack from strong malicious participants. The backdoor attack is inconspicuous and may result in devastating consequences. To resist the attack on IIoT applications, we propose the federated backdoor filter defense that can identify backdoor inputs and restore the data to availability by theblur-label-flippingstrategy. We build multiple filters with eXplainable AI models on the server and send them to clients randomly, preventing advanced attackers from evading the defense. Our backdoor filters show significant backdoor recognition with the accuracy up to 99%. After the implementation of the blur-label-flipping strategy, victim's local model on suspicious backdoor samples can achieve the accuracy up to 88%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing defense methods only show reasonable performance against specific types of attacks.
“However, these methods only show reasonable performance against specific types of attacks.”
From Data and model poisoning backdoor attacks on wireless federated learning, and the defense mechanisms: A comprehensive survey (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
Backdoor attacks during the local model training phase require attackers to have complete control over compromised clients.
“Backdoor attacks during the local model training phase require attackers to have complete control over compromised clients [39], [49], [242].”
From Data and model poisoning backdoor attacks on wireless federated learning, and the defense mechanisms: A comprehensive survey (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Hou, B., Gao, J., Guo, X., Baker, T., Zhang, Y., Wen, Y., & Liu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3562-3571
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W3200805806
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1005700)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62032012)
- NSFC-General Technology Joint Fund for Basic Research (U1936206, U1836109)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- backdoor attacks, federated learning, Industrial Internet of Things, backdoor detection, explainable AI, malicious participants, defense evasion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review