Experience-Driven Attack Design and Federated-Learning-Based Intrusion Detection in Industry 4.0
Abstract
The advent of Industry 4.0 facilitates the Int- ernet-of-Things-based-transactive energy system (IoTES), which enables innovative services with numerous independent distributed systems. These systems generate heterogeneous data in bulk, which become susceptible to cyber-attacks, particularly the stealthy false data injection attacks (FDIAs). The existing centralized FDIA detection algorithms often breach data privacy and fail to perform effectively in highly dynamic and distributed environments, such as IoTES. To resolve the issue, initially, a recurrent deep deterministic policy gradient is utilized to invent an experience-driven FDIA in a complex IoTES. The attacker intends to intelligently exploit the data integrity of smart energy meters with insufficient knowledge of the system. Subsequently, to countermove the stealth and enable independent clients to train a centralized model while keeping each client’s data privacy intact, a deep-federated-learning-based decentralized FDIA detection method using an attentive aggregation is exploited in this article. The proposed approach is capable of parallel computing and can reliably identify the stealthy FDIA on all the nodes simultaneously. Simulation results validate that the proposed scheme outperforms the state-of-the-art methods under a distributed environment with a significantly higher detection accuracy and lower computational complexity while keeping the data privacy intact.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authors in [69] find a solution by raising two questions: how hospitals allocate resources to end devices and how other agencies participating in this program will compensate for the resources used by other hospitals.
“The authors in [69] find the solution to this problem by arising two questions: how hospitals allocate resources to end devices and how other agencies participating in this program will compensate for the resources used by other hospitals.”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
The problem is treated as non-convex optimization, and distributed techniques are investigated to solve such problems.
“In this context, the problem is treated as non-convex optimization, and distributed techniques are investigated to solve such problems.”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Tahir, B., Jolfaei, A., & Tariq, M.
- Affiliations
- National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (PK)
- Flinders University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6398-6405
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W4205292723
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
- Keywords
- false data injection attacks, federated learning, intrusion detection, Industry 4.0, Internet of Things, transactive energy, smart meters, deep deterministic policy gradient, data privacy, distributed attack detection, cyber-physical security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review