Cited by 299Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

A Real-Time Visual Inspection System for Discrete Surface Defects of Rail Heads

Li, Qingyong, Ren, Shengwei·2012·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Discrete surface defects impact the riding quality and safety of a railway system. However, it is a challenge to inspect such defects in a vision system because of illumination inequality and the variation of reflection property of rail surfaces. This paper puts forward a real-time visual inspection system (VIS) for discrete surface defects. VIS first acquires a rail image by the image acquisition system, and then, it cuts the subimage of rail track by the track extraction algorithm. Subsequently, VIS enhances the contrast of the rail image using the local normalization (LN) method, which is nonlinear and illumination independent. At last, VIS detects defects using the defect localization based on projection profile (DLBP), which is robust to noise and very fast. Our experimental results demonstrate that VIS detects the Type-II defects with a recall of 93.10% and Type-I defects with a recall of 80.41%, and the proposed LN method and DLBP algorithm are better than the related well-established approaches. Furthermore, VIS is very fast with a linear computational time complexity, and it can be in real time to run on a 216-km/h test train under our experimental setup.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2012.2184959

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LED is the most widely used luminaire in machine vision applications due to its advantages of longevity and low heat production.

    “Among them, LED is the most widely used luminaire in machine vision applications due to its advantages of longevity and low heat production [35, 37, 38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., & Ren, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
  • China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2012-08
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
2189-2199
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2069747077
Cited by
299
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
real-time visual inspection, railway track inspection, local normalization, illumination invariance, image contrast enhancement, high-speed trains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review