The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Three IoT-Based Wireless Sensors for Environmental Monitoring
Abstract
The recent changes in climate have increased the importance of environmental monitoring, making it a topical and highly active research area. This field is based on remote sensing and on wireless sensor networks for gathering data about the environment. Recent advancements, such as the vision of the Internet of Things (IoT), the cloud computing model, and cyber-physical systems, provide support for the transmission and management of huge amounts of data regarding the trends observed in environmental parameters. In this context, the current work presents three different IoT-based wireless sensors for environmental and ambient monitoring: one employing User Datagram Protocol (UDP)-based Wi-Fi communication, one communicating through Wi-Fi and Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), and a third one using Bluetooth Smart. All of the presented systems provide the possibility of recording data at remote locations and of visualizing them from every device with an Internet connection, enabling the monitoring of geographically large areas. The development details of these systems are described, along with the major differences and similarities between them. The feasibility of the three developed systems for implementing monitoring applications, taking into account their energy autonomy, ease of use, solution complexity, and Internet connectivity facility, was analyzed, and revealed that they make good candidates for IoT-based solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bluetooth: a viable solution for IoT? [Industry Perspectives]
Chang, K.-H. (2014) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2014.7000963 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Advances in Smart Environment Monitoring Systems Using IoT and Sensors
Ullo, S. L., & Sinha, G. R. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20113113 · Cited by 730
Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture: A Review
Jawad, H., Nordin, R., Gharghan, S., Jawad, A., & Ismail, M. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17081781 · Cited by 710
Development of Smart Healthcare Monitoring System in IoT Environment
Islam, M. M., Rahaman, A., & Islam, M. R. (2020) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00195-y · Cited by 592
Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Agricultural Sector: A Systematic Literature Review
Elbasi, E., Mostafa, N., AlArnaout, Z., Zreikat, A. I., Cina, E., Varghese, G., Shdefat, A., Topcu, A. E., Abdelbaki, W., Mathew, S., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3232485 · Cited by 282
An Empirical Study on System Level Aspects of Internet of Things (IoT)
Swamy, S. N., & Kota, S. R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3029847 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Mois, G., Folea, S., & Sanislav, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2056-2064
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W2604042328
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Three IoT-Based Wireless Sensors for Environmental Monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2017.2677619
- The paper
- Mois, G., Folea, S., & Sanislav, T. (2017). Analysis of Three IoT-Based Wireless Sensors for Environmental Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2017.2677619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.