Cited by 90Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFault Detection and Control Systems

Adversarial Multiple-Target Domain Adaptation for Fault Classification

Ragab, Mohamed, Chen, Zhenghua, Wu, Min, Li, Haoliang, Kwoh, Chee-Keong, Yan, Ruqiang, Li, Xiaoli·2021·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Data-driven fault classification methods are receiving great attention as they can be applied to many real-world applications. However, they work under the assumption that training data and testing data are drawn from the same distribution. Practical scenarios have varying operating conditions, which results in a domain-shift problem that significantly deteriorates the diagnosis performance. Recently, domain adaptation (DA) has been explored to address the domain-shift problem by transferring the knowledge from labeled source domain (e.g., source working condition) to unlabeled target domain (e.g., target working condition). Yet, all the existing methods are working under single-source single-target (1S1T) settings. Hence, a new model needs to be trained for each new target domain. This shows limited scalability in handling multiple working conditions since different models should be trained for different target working conditions, which is clearly not a viable solution in practice. To address this problem, we propose a novel adversarial multiple-target DA (AMDA) method for single-source multiple-target (1SmT) scenario, where the model can generalize to multiple-target domains concurrently. Adversarial adaptation is applied to transform the multiple-target domain features to be invariant from the single-source-domain features. This leads to a scalable model with a novel capability of generalizing to multiple-target domains. Extensive experiments on two public datasets and one self-collected dataset have demonstrated that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods consistently. Our source codes and data are available athttps://github.com/mohamedr002/AMDA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2020.3009341

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each working condition in the Fault Diagnosis dataset can be considered a separate domain because it has different characteristics from the other working conditions.

    “Each working condition can be considered as a separate domain as it has different characteristics from the other working conditions [Ragab et al. , 2020].”

    From Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (2021) · cites this paper as Ragab et al. , 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ragab, M., Chen, Z., Wu, M., Li, H., Kwoh, C.-K., Yan, R., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2021
Volume
70
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W3043790829
Cited by
90
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • A*STAR Industrial Internet of Things Research Program though the RIE2020 IAF-PP (A1788a0023)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51835009)
  • A*STAR SINGA Scholarship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
domain adaptation, adversarial learning, fault classification, domain shift, working condition variation, feature invariance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review