Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep Apnea Detection From Single-Lead ECG: A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms

Bahrami, Mahsa, Forouzanfar, Mohamad·2022·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Sleep apnea is a common sleep breathing disorder (SBD) in which patients suffer from stopping or decreasing airflow to the lungs for more than 10 sec. Accurate detection of sleep apnea episodes is an important step in devising appropriate therapies and management strategies. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of machine learning and deep learning algorithms on 70 recordings of the PhysioNet ECG Sleep Apnea v1.0.0 dataset. First, electrocardiogram signals were pre-processed and segmented and then machine learning and deep learning methods were applied for sleep apnea detection. Among conventional machine learning algorithms, linear and quadratic discriminate analyses, logistic regression, Gaussian naïve Bayes, Gaussian process, support-vector machines,$k$-nearest neighbor, decision tree, extra tree, random forest, AdaBoost, gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, and majority voting were implemented. Among deep algorithms, convolutional networks (Alex-Net, VGG16, VGG19, ZF-Net), recurrent networks (LSTM, bidirectional LSTM, gated recurrent unit), and hybrid convolutional-recurrent networks were implemented. All networks were similarly modified to handle our biosignal processing task. The available data were divided into a training set to adjust the model parameters, a validation set to adjust hyperparameters, avoid overfitting, and improve the generalizability of the models, and a test set to evaluate the generalizability of the models on unseen data. This procedure was then repeated in a fivefold cross-validation scheme so that all the recordings were once located in the test set. It was found that the best detection performance is achieved by hybrid deep models where the best accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 88.13%, 84.26%, and 92.27%, respectively. This study provides valuable information on how different machine learning and deep learning algorithms perform in the detection of sleep apnea and can further be extended toward the detection of other sleep events. Our developed algorithms are publicly available on GitHub.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2022.3151947

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Bahrami, M., & Forouzanfar, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2022
Volume
71
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W4212859008
Cited by
173
References
6
FWCI
22.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sleep Apnea Detection From Single-Lead ECG: A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2022.3151947
The paper
Bahrami, M., & Forouzanfar, M. (2022). Sleep Apnea Detection From Single-Lead ECG: A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2022.3151947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.